One of AT&T's arguments for acquiring rival T-Mobile is that the combined companies will help it expand 4G LTE service to the entire country. But critics of the deal point to a document they say contradicts that.
Comm Daily has published a document it says is from AT&T's filing with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), admitting that expanding its most advanced network to 97 percent of the country would cost an estimated $3.8 billion. But the filing shows AT&T rejected that option, claiming there wasn’t a “viable business case” to justify the expansion.
So why, critics ask, is AT&T willing to spend $39 billion on the T-Mobile takeover — 10 times as much? And the company is committed to paying T-Mobile $6 billion in total compensation if the deal falls through, $2.2 billion more than it would cost to expand its service.
On Friday, the consumer non-profit Free Press said it obtained an AT&T "fact" sheet being used to lure support for the merger. The fact sheet features the claim that the proposed combination of AT&T and T-Mobile is the "rare case where 1 + 1 = 3."
Fuzzy math
Free Press President and CEO Craig Aaron says, not only is it fuzzy math, but AT&T's case for this takeover doesn't withstand scrutiny.
“As the real numbers and facts come to the public's attention, support for this merger continues to unravel,” Aaron said. “ The Department of Justice and the FCC have all the evidence they need to block this dangerous deal.
Aaron claims the real reason AT&T is willing to pay a $39 billion premium for T-Mobile is to kill off the competition.
“It would cost AT&T one-tenth of the merger’s cost to expand its network than to buy up T-Mobile,” Aaron said. “Yet AT&T is willing to pay a 900-percent markup to take out a lower-priced competitor and make sure it can lock in and gouge consumers in the future. The only thing stopping AT&T from expanding its network is greed. One plus one does not equal three, but subtracting one competitor adds up to billions in profits for AT&T and thousands of Americans out of work.”
Largest mobile network
The combination of AT&T and T-Mobile would create, by far, the nation's largest mobile network. Verizon Wireless, currently the largest mobile provider, would be a distant second.
Sprint CEO Dan Hesse has been outspoken in his opposition to the proposed deal, saying if it is allow to proceed, it would not bode well for the U.S. wireless industry.
Sung Cho (Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:33:16 +0000): ATT can suck it.
Jason Madison (Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:18:40 +0000): AT&T boo!
Daniel Daschke (Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:07:33 +0000): This could raise cell phone rates for everyone not just t-mobile users, less compition means higher prices its basic economy. Let's band together and stop this, everyone speak out.
Lars Sveen (Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:09:13 +0000): Wait... people were behind this merger?
Dave Tucker (Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:34:20 +0000): Look at the history of AT&T. This is a total "Scamola" I guess they think the folks at the FCC are just as stupid as the Execs at AT&T? Ask the t-mobile users. We all know what saved AT&T. APPLE DID! That's how come they can throw all that money around.......Less competition is not the American way........
Faye-Linda Quimby McGovern (Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:47:22 +0000): greed and dishonesty just doesn't stop, does it? This is what will finally bring this country to its knees. Too bad!
Philip Camacho (Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:52:57 +0000): Block the merger.
Craig Briskin (Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:08:53 +0000): AT&T + T-Mobile = better reception? Oh, that's a good one.
Eric Wang (Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:00:47 +0000): Remember, the current AT&T (wireless division) is Cingular Wireless + AT&T Wireless already who were, respectively, the 3rd and 2nd largest wireless providers back then. If AT&T and T-mobile merger goes through, the choices will become even fewer.