Addiction to drugs and alcohol may seem to strike random people
at random times. And of those people trying to kick their
addictions, the success rate of rehabilitation seems random,
too.
But new research from the Center for Addiction Research
in Little Rock, Arkansas on the brain could provide a possible
explanation how some people are more susceptible to substance abuse
problems than others.
These findings could also provide a way for educators to better
teach young people about the risks of drug and alcohol
addiction.
Currently, schools educate students about the risks of addiction,
mainly focusing on the long-term ill effects of substance
abuse.
This works for some people, but not all. (Read consumer complaints
about drug
companies).
Delay discounting may be paralleled by "reward myopia," a tendency to opt for immediately rewarding stimuli, like drugs.
Thus, people vulnerable to substance abuse problems are those that opt for the immediately rewarding effects of drugs, despite knowing they’re harmful in the long run.
Delay discounting is a cognitive function that involves brain circuits including the frontal cortex. It builds upon working memory, the brain's "scratchpad", i.e., a system for temporarily storing and managing information reasoning to guide behavior.
Borrowed approach
In a new article in Biological Psychiatry that studied this
process, Dr. Warren Bickel and his colleagues used an approach
borrowed from the rehabilitation of people who suffered a stroke or
a traumatic brain injury.
The researchers had stimulant abusers repeatedly perform a working
memory task, "exercising" their brains in a way that promoted the
functional enhancement of the underlying cognitive circuits.
They found that this type of training improved working memory and
also reduced their tendency to discount delayed rewards.
Dr. John Krystal, Editor of Biological Psychiatry said the health
and legal ramifications associated with substance abuse is
meaningless to the addict during the moment they’re
considering whether or not to take their drug because “their
mind is filled with the imagination of the pleasure to
follow.”
"We now see evidence that this myopic view of immediate pleasures
and delayed punishments is not a fixed feature of addiction.
Perhaps cognitive training is one tool that clinicians may employ
to end the hijacking of imagination by drugs of abuse," said
Krystal.
Bickel agrees, adding "although this research will need to be
replicated and extended, we hope that it will provide a new target
for treatment and a new method to intervene on the problem of
addiction."
The article is "Remember the Future: Working Memory Training
Decreases Delay Discounting Among Stimulant Addicts" by Warren K.
Bickel, Richard Yi, Reid D. Landes, Paul F. Hill, and Carole
Baxter.
Bickel, Yi, and Hill are affiliated with the Department of
Psychiatry, Center for Addiction Research, Little Rock,
Arkansas.
Landes is with the Department of Biostatistics, University of
Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. Baxter is
from Recovery Centers of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas.
The article appears in the February 2011 issue of Biological Psychiatry.