1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Consumer Affairs

Nine Sued for Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

Justice Department seeks to hold companies liable ‘without limitation’


The Justice Department  (DOJ) has filed a civil lawsuit against nine defendants in connection with the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  

The lawsuit asks the court for civil penalties under the Clean Water Act and to declare eight of the defendants liable without limitation under the Oil Pollution Act for all removal costs and damages caused by the oil spill, including damages to natural resources.

Placing blame

In the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court in New Orleans, the U.S. alleges violations of federal safety and operational regulations which caused or contributed to the oil spill that began on April 20, 2010, when an explosion and fire destroyed the Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 50 miles from the Mississippi River delta.

"We intend to prove that these defendants are responsible for government removal costs, economic losses, and environmental damages without limitation," said Attorney General Eric Holder.   "Even though the spill has been contained, the Department's focus on investigating this disaster and preventing future devastation has not wavered.   Both our civil and criminal investigations continue, and our work to ensure that the American taxpayers are not forced to bear the costs of restoring the gulf area and its economy is moving forward."

Defendants

Those named in the lawsuit are BP Exploration and Production Inc.; Anadarko Exploration & Production LP and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (known collectively as "Anadarko Defendants"); MOEX Offshore 2007 LLC; Triton Asset Leasing GMBH, Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., and Transocean Deepwater Inc. (known collectively as "Transocean Defendants"); and Transocean's insurer, QBE Underwriting Ltd./Lloyd's Syndicate 1036.  

QBE/Lloyd's can be held liable only up to the amount of insurance policy coverage under the Oil Pollution Act and is not being sued under the Clean Water Act.

Multiple violations

According to the complaint, important safety and operating regulations were violated in the period leading up to the April 20, 2010, oil spill, including:

  • Failing to take necessary precautions to keep the Macondo Well under control in the period leading up to the April 20th explosion;
  • Failing to use the best available and safest drilling technology to monitor the well's conditions;
  • Failing to maintain continuous surveillance; and
  • Failing to use and maintain equipment and material that were available and necessary to ensure the safety and protection of personnel, equipment, natural resources, and the environment.

The complaint contends that these violations caused or contributed to the massive oil spill, and that the defendants are therefore responsible for removal costs and damages without limitation under the Oil Pollution Act.

Civil penalties sought

The complaint also includes claims for civil penalties under the Clean Water Act, which prohibits the unauthorized discharge of oil into the nation's waters. It alleges that the defendants named in the lawsuit were in violation of the Act throughout the months that oil was gushing into the Gulf of Mexico.  

Quantcast