|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
|
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
New York Files Antitrust Suit Against IntelSuit claims chip maker engaged in unfair business practices | ||||||||
|
By Mark Huffman
November 4, 2009 New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo Wednesday filed suit against Intel, accusing it of engaging in a "worldwide, systematic campaign of illegal conduct" -- revealed in e-mails -- in order to maintain its monopoly power and prices in the market for microprocessors. Intel has faced similar suits in Europe and Asia and paid fines totaling $1.45 billion to the European Commission. The Cuomo suit focuses on recent exclusive agreements from large computer makers in which they agreed to use Intel's microprocessors in exchange for payments totaling billions of dollars. The complaint alleges that Intel also threatened to and did in fact punish computer makers that they perceived to be working too closely with Intel's competitors. The suit claims the retaliatory threats included cutting off payments the computer maker was receiving from Intel, directly funding a computer maker's competitors, and ending joint development ventures. "Rather than compete fairly, Intel used bribery and coercion to maintain a stranglehold on the market," said Cuomo. "Intel's actions not only unfairly restricted potential competitors, but also hurt average consumers who were robbed of better products and lower prices. These illegal tactics must stop and competition must be restored to this vital marketplace." Cuomo said Intel paid hundreds of millions of dollars annually -- and in some years billions of dollars -- in so-called "rebates" to individual computer makers. He claims these rebates were actually just payoffs with no legitimate business purpose that Intel invented to disguise their anticompetitive nature. He says Intel also attempted to erase the most obvious traces of its anticompetitive scheme by eliminating crucial but flagrantly objectionable provisions from written agreements or by camouflaging language about illegal guaranteed market shares with terms like "volume targets." The payments for exclusivity that Intel provided could make the difference between profit and loss for a computer maker or a segment of its business, Cuomo said. Sometimes, the payments from Intel exceeded a company's reported quarterly net income. The suit, which was filed today in federal court, seeks to bar further anticompetitive acts by Intel, restore lost competition, recover monetary damages suffered by New York governmental entities and consumers, and collect penalties. Report Your Experience
|
||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2010 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|