|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Oklahoma Charges BP With Propane Price-FixingAttorney General claims unfair and deceptive acts |
|||||||||||||
|
June 2, 2009
The state's suit accuses BP of "unfair and deceptive acts in attempting to manipulate and manipulating the commodities markets for propane...with the effect of increasing prices in Oklahoma." The state accuses BP of orchestrating a successful strategy to corner the February 2004 propane market and manipulate prices for the commodity. The state alleges, by the end of that month, BP owned 88 percent of all propane in the Texas system, which is the primary source for the gas in Oklahoma. According to the complaint, BP's actions had increased the price of propane more than 40 percent from Feb. 4 to Feb. 25. In contrast, the state of Washington, which relies on an Alaskan system for its main propane supply, saw prices decline during that same period. Propane is a multimillion dollar industry in Oklahoma and, according to the state's complaint, energy systems designed to burn propane cannot run on other fuels. "Oklahomans who use propane systems to heat their homes and power their businesses were held hostage by BP's scheme and had no other choice but to buy propane at the artificially higher price," Edmondson said. "Propane is heavily used by our state's agriculture community as well, and spikes in prices can have a significant impact on Oklahoma farmers." The state's civil lawsuit, filed in Oklahoma County District Court, seeks to prohibit BP from engaging in similar conduct. The suit also seeks consumer restitution and penalties. Defendants in the suit are BP America and subsidiaries BP Corporation North America Inc., BP Products North America Inc. and BP American Production Co. Although BP has already settled similar federal and class action suits, few if any Oklahoma consumers were included in those cases. Because of the complexities of commodities and futures law, the state is consulting with legal experts in that field regarding the lawsuit. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|