NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Employment    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Insurance    Pets    Shopping    Travel     Print This     Email This    



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Extendicare Suit Tossed for Vagueness

Judge says allegations are not specific enough





By Jon Hood
ConsumerAffairs.com

March 9, 2009

More Nursing Home News

A federal court threw out a lawsuit against nursing home chain Extendicare, ruling that the plaintiffs' allegations were not specific enough to form an actionable claim.

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota in October, alleged that Extendicare overstated the quality of its services in pamphlets and promotional materials, thereby luring elderly residents into their facilities. According to the complaint, however, once residents arrived there, they found that the service what it was cracked up to be. The suit was filed on behalf of lead plaintiff Laura Bernstein, and defined a class consisting of "all residents who lived in a Minnesota Extendicare facility from Oct. 29, 2002 through Oct. 29, 2008."

At the time the lawsuit was filed, lead attorney Gale Pearson pointed out that, while Extendicare's advertising materials touted the company's "high-quality, skilled nursing care services," the company's 10 Minnesota facilities were repeatedly cited by officials for violation of state laws.

The complaint's allegations, while potentially serious, were not especially specific, which led to the judge's dismissal of the case. The suit attacked the facilities' admission policy, which rated perspective patients' medical conditions by "flag" color, with a "green flag" condition rated as the most serious. The company's procedure mandated automatic admission for any patient labeled with "green flag" status. The lawsuit suggests that this policy leads to overcrowding, and doesn't take into account whether the facility can provide adequate care for the admitted patient, or whether it will deprive other residents of much-needed medical attention.

Lead attorney Pearson also speculated that the policy didn’t take into account whether the patient was "a felon or even a sex offender."

At the time the suit was filed, co-lead counsel Stephen Garcia said, "In my opinion, the Extendicare facilities in Washington are elder abuse cases waiting to happen. It's just a matter of whose parents or grandparents are going to be the victims."

The suit also accused Extendicare of violating Minnesota law in requiring incoming patients to sign a contract waiving the company's liability for personal injury or property loss. Minnesota law states that nursing home admissions agreements cannot include any such waiver.

In dismissing the case, Judge Donovan W. Frank held that the allegations were "so general and unspecific they cannot serve as the basis for a claim." He was so unimpressed with the suit that he prohibited the plaintiffs from refilling with amended counts, holding that the claims were so weak that such an exercise "would not likely be fruitful." Federal rules of procedure set a very low threshold for what constitutes "stating a claim," and courts are generally lenient in allowing plaintiffs to re-file vague suits, so Judge Frank's ruling suggests that this was a particularly weak case.

According to its website, Extendicare operates 266 facilities in 12 states and Canada, and has the capacity to care for 30,000 residents. The company has been operating since 1968 and touts itself as "one of North America's largest long-term care providers."

Elder abuse has gained notoriety in recent years, and a number of lawsuits have been brought on behalf of nursing home residents claiming inadequate care. In September, California long-term care provider Sun Mar settled a class action brought by Garcia, co-lead counsel in the Extendicare action. The suit pled very similar allegations, namely that Sun Mar promoted its facilities above and beyond what they were actually capable of. The suit settled for $2 million.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share

Follow us on Twitter.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.