|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
![]() |
Economists Offer Plan for Stabilizing House PricesSuccess of bailout plan rests on revitalizing housing market |
||||||||||||||
|
October 5, 2008
Writing in The Wall Street Journal, economists R. Glenn Hubbard and Chris Mayer call on the government to push down residential mortgage rates to 5.25%, close to where mortgage rates would be in a normally functioning mortgage market and matching the lowest mortgage rate in the past 30 years. The authors point out that falling housing values have caused the credit market to seize up, perpetuating further declines in house prices and contributing significantly to the current financial mess. They propose lowering the mortgage rate to stop this decline, with the following terms:
Negative equityMortgages on homes that are worth less than the total amount of the loan (homes with "negative equity") could be refinanced into 30-year fixed-rate loans to be held by a new agency modeled after the 1930s-era Home Owners' Loan Corporation. The new agency would split the losses on refinancing a mortgage with servicers and owners and take an equity position in return for the write-down (which could be capped to limit liability), allowing taxpayers to profit once the market recovers. Expected outcomes include:
The authors conclude that this plan could be enacted quickly, as the government now controls nearly 90 percent of the mortgage market. They predict the cost to taxpayers would be modest: while the government could end up assuming trillions of dollars of additional mortgages on its balance sheet, these would be backed by houses and the verified ability of millions of Americans to pay back the debt. Finally, they suggest that this plan would help the economy independent of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 passed by Congress. Stabilizing house prices increases the value of the securities that the government would buy, thereby minimizing the net cost to taxpayers if the plan currently before Congress were to be implemented, they say. Report Your Experience
|
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|