|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
FTC Backs Crackdown on Pre-Paid Phone Card AbusesAgency wants legislation against deceptive marketing tactics |
|||||||||||||
|
September 16, 2008
FTC Chairman William E. Kovacic told the committee that the Commission would continue to conduct consumer education programs and bring law enforcement actions involving deceptively marketed prepaid phone cards. In two cases filed this spring against major distributors of prepaid calling cards, the FTC alleged that the defendants marketed their cards to recent immigrants, misrepresented the number of calling minutes provided by their cards, and failed to disclose adequately fees and charges associated with their cards. The FTC said it conducted tests on the cards before it filed the suits. In the first lawsuit, the cards delivered, on average, less than 43 percent of the advertised calling minutes. In the second suit, the cards delivered, on average, only 50.4 percent of the minutes advertised. "The FTC Act's prohibitions on deceptive and unfair practices provide the Commission with a powerful tool to bring enforcement actions against the distributors of prepaid calling cards," Kovacic said. Kovacic testified in support of the Prepaid Calling Card Consumer Protection Act. The bill would require prepaid calling card providers and distributors to clearly and conspicuously disclose, among other things, the dollar value of their calling cards, or the number of minutes provided by their calling cards, and conditions pertaining to their cards, such as fees and limitations. The FTC also repeated its recommendation that Congress allow the agency to enforce provisions of the FTC Act against common carriers providing prepaid telecommunications services. Currently, common carriers subject to the Communications Act currently are exempt from the FTC Act's prohibitions on unfair and deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of competition. This exemption originated in an era when telecommunications services were provided by highly regulated monopolies, and the FTC has testified several times in favor of repealing it. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|