|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Texas Sues Prepaid Calling Card CompanyCharges Next-G with delivering fewer minutes than advertised |
|||||||||||||
|
May 27, 2008
Court documents filed by Attorney General Greg Abbott indicate Next-G Communication, Inc. produces, sells and distributes prepaid calling cards throughout Texas but consistently fails to deliver the number of minutes it advertises to customers. The AG’s joint investigation with the Public Utility Commission (PUC), which regulates prepaid calling card companies in Texas, found that Next-G’s prepaid calling cards consistently delivered only 40 percent of the minutes claimed on the defendants’ advertising posters and confirmed by Next-G’s voice prompt given at the beginning of each call. The defendants typically sold the cards at small grocery stores and convenience stores for less than $10 each. “Texas consumers who rely on prepaid calling cards for their long distance needs should be getting what they are promised,” Abbott said. “We are grateful to the Public Utility Commission for their tremendous assistance on this case. The Office of the Attorney General will continue to crack down on scams that deceive Texas customers.” According to the legal action, Next-G Communication offers prepaid calling services to several international destinations. To use the card, customers must first dial the defendants’ access number and enter a personal identification number (PIN), which is provided with the card. Once the PIN is verified, the defendants’ computer system prompts the caller to enter a destination phone number and informs the caller how many minutes are available on the card for the call. State investigators who independently tested the cards found that Next-G’s calling cards consistently failed to deliver either the number of minutes on the advertising posters or the number of minutes prompted at the beginning of the call. In addition, the calling cards and the advertising posters contain vague and inadequate disclosures about fees and additional charges. The suit seeks a temporary and permanent injunction against Next-G Communication’s deceptive marketing claims and civil penalties of up to $20,000 per violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|