|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
Rushing Into a Smaller Car Too Soon May Not Save MoneyOverall vehicle costs can offset any savings at the pump |
|||||
|
May 23, 2008
But a new study from Consumer Reports warns drivers that downsizing too soon can cost them more in other owner costs than they'll save at the pump. CR has always encouraged drivers to buy more fuel-efficient vehicles. But if the timing isn't right, it can cost you more in the long run. An analysis of the magazine’s exclusive owner-cost data found that it often doesn't pay to downsize if you've only owned your vehicle for three years or less and haven't paid off the loan, even if the new car's fuel economy is much better. Consumer Reports' experts say consumers should typically hold on to their cars at least four or five years to minimize the financial impact of depreciation and finance charges. Owner cost data include depreciation, fuel usage, interest on financing, insurance, maintenance and repair, and sales tax. According to CR’s calculations, depreciation makes up about 48 percent of an average owner's total vehicle costs in the first five years of ownership. Fuel, however, averages only about 21 percent of total costs. Because the greatest depreciation occurs in the first three years, your car costs you less to own overall in the following years. So for a typical, payment-making owner with a 60-month loan, trading in a three-year-old vehicle means you've just taken the biggest depreciation hit on your current car and still have a lot of the loan principle yet to pay off. What you'll save in depreciation costs by holding onto the vehicle for another year or two will net you more money in the long run than you'd save in gasoline with the new car. "These hidden costs may be the factors you are least likely to focus on when downsizing," said Rik Paul, automotive editor, Consumer Reports. "After all, depreciation and interest are less tangible costs than the high price for a gallon of gas that slaps drivers in the face with each fill up." For example, a 2005 Ford Five Hundred SEL V6 sedan got 21 mpg overall in Consumer Reports' testing. The 2008 Toyota Prius got 44. Assuming 12,000 miles per year at the current national average for gasoline of $3.75 per gallon, the Ford will cost about $2,000 in gas this year, while the Toyota will cost just $1,000. But factoring in all of the owner costs of trading in the Five Hundred now, the Toyota will cost about $9,000 to own for the first 12 months, while the Ford costs $6,000. That's a difference of $3,000, or $0.23 per mile. "Based on today's numbers, it's less expensive to tough out another year or two with a gas guzzler than trade-in too early," Paul said. "However, if gas prices rise past $5 a gallon, large vehicles may see their depreciation accelerate and owners could face new challenges in selling their old model." CR continues to advise shoppers to buy the highest-rated, most reliable, and safest model with good fuel economy that suits their needs. When it comes time to buy a new model, there are considerable savings and advantages to downsizing, but consumers should understand the full financial impact of the timing for their decision. Jeff Bartlett, deputy automotive editor, ConsumerReports.org, adds, "While we support the downsizing trend in principle, we caution consumers to look at their long-term owner costs and not rush to make a change they may later regret." Report Your Experience
|
|||||
Back to the top | |
||||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Video |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |