CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Supreme Court Upholds Right To Sue 401(k) Administrators

Unanimous decision defends right of individuals to sue



By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

February 20, 2008

Personal Finance

Supreme Court Upholds Right To Sue 401(k) Administrators
Retirees May Face Unexpected Lifestyle Changes
Survey: Americans Not Saving Enough
Money Market Funds: No-Brainer, or No Brains?
Two Bear Stearns Hedge Funds Go Broke
UBS Pays $23 Million to Settle NY Charges It Misled Clients
Supreme Court Deals Investors Another Setback
Supreme Court Rejects Investor Claims
---
More Personal Finance News

If your 401(k) retirement account took a hit because your administrator didn't follow your directions, you just might have a case. The U.S. Supreme Court today unanimously upheld the right of retirement account holders to sue.

An estimated 70 million people in the U.S. have a 401(k) or other type of retirement savings and investment account.

The court ruled in the case of a consumer who said he lost nearly $100,000 from his retirement account because his employer did not act on the investment changes in requested in his account. The justices ruled in his favor and, for the first time, found that individual participants in a plan had standing to sue over the handling of a single account.

The ruling affects all defined-contribution retirement programs, including 401(k), employee stock ownership (ESOP) and profit-sharing plans. Defined contribution accounts have an estimated $3.3 trillion in assets.

The case stems from the steep stock market selloff in the weeks following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

James LaRue told the court he submitted a number of changes to his 401(k) plan in an effort to mitigate losses from the market's rapid decline. According to LaRue's attorney, his employer, DeWolff Boberg & Associates of Dallas, Texas, didn't follow his instructions.

The result, he claimed in court, was a loss of almost $100,000.

The Supreme Court took the case after a lower appeals court in Virginia refused to hear it, saying suits such as LaRue's weren't allowed under the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

--

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.