CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Court Rebuffs Burger King in Trans Fat Case

Other big burger chains are phasing out harmful trans fats





February 27, 2008

Trans Fats

Court Rebuffs Burger King in Trans Fat Case
Dunkin’ Donuts to Dump the Trans Fat
Burger King Hit With Trans Fat Lawsuit
KFC Removes Trans Fat From Chicken Fryers
Harvard Study Links Trans Fat To Heart Disease
Burger King Testing Trans Fat-Free Cooking Oils
Starbucks Cuts Trans Fats
Scientists Claim Development Of "Healthy" Trans Fat
Loews Hotels Ban Trans Fat from Menus
New York City Bans Trans Fats in Restaurants
KFC Plans To Cut The Trans Fat
New York City Considers Trans Fat Ban
Researchers: Food Labels Should List All Fats
KFC Sued Over Artery-Clogging Oils
Wendy's Cuts Trans Fats in Fries and Chicken
---
More ...

Lawyers for Burger King have failed to have a lawsuit over the company’s use of artificial trans fat dismissed.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest sued the chain in May 2007 because it is the only one of the three top burger chains not to promise to phase out its use of partially hydrogenated frying oil.

CSPI sued in Superior Court for the District of Columbia, but Burger King transferred the case to a federal court and then asked for it to be dismissed, insisting, ironically, that CSPI’s claims did not belong in federal court.

On February 19, a federal judge rejected each of Burger King’s legal arguments and sent the case back to D.C. Superior Court -- setting the stage for what CSPI hopes will be a trial that results in an injunction stopping the chain from using the discredited ingredient or, at the very least, requiring prominent signage warning of trans fat in BK’s fried foods.

“Burger King’s argument was similar to that of the kid who kills his parents and then asks for leniency because he’s an orphan -- it transferred the case to a court where it did not belong, and then asked that court to dismiss the case,” said CSPI’s Litigation Director Stephen Gardner. “It is increasingly clear that the proper way for Burger King to make this case go away is to stop using oils with artificial trans fat in its deep-fryers.”

Wendy’s and McDonald’s are phasing out their use of partially hydrogenated oil. KFC stopped using it for deep-frying in 2007 after CSPI sued the company, though it still uses it in biscuits and pot pies.

Fried foods from Burger King are alarmingly high in trans fat, according to CSPI. A regular-size order of Chicken Tenders with a large order of French fries has 8 grams of trans -- more than someone should consume in four days.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.