|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
New Fuel Economy Standards Signal End for the V-8Bush signs bill setting 35-mpg fuel economy standard |
||||||||||||||
|
By Joe Benton December 20, 2007
Bush signed the energy bill that includes an increase in mileage for cars and trucks to 35 mpg by 2020 in a ceremony at the Energy Department. The mileage increase is a result of the shift in political control of Congress to the Democrats and their campaign to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Members of both political parties and a handful of auto industry representatives attended the bill signing. Automakers fought the increases in fuel-economy mandates but caved in at the end in an effort to win regulatory certainty for future product planning. The bill will require a 40 percent increase in car and truck fuel economy standards by 2020 when a 35 mpg fleet average is required. The gradual implementation of the tougher standards begins with the 2011 model year. "This country needs to have a comprehensive energy strategy," Bush said at the bill signing. The energy bill will also provide at least $90 million a year for research to bring plug-in hybrids to the consumer market. Congressional approval of the new corporate average fuel economy standards (CAFE) followed a compromise in which Democratic leaders agreed to remove tax increases and other provisions that would have required utilities to use more renewable fuels. President Bush had threatened to veto the bill unless the $22 billion in tax hikes were deleted. The new law requires a dramatic increase in alternative fuel production and provide incentives for production and purchase of energy-efficient products. Reluctance in DetroitU.S. automakers along with Toyota Motor Corp. reluctantly supported the new CAFE provisions in an effort to convince lawmakers that fuel economy standards should take precedence over greenhouse gas emission rules. The automakers tried to craft a bill that would limit the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency to set fuel economy standards or states to limit green house gas emission. After a series of court rulings, the EPA now has broad power to control greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks and automakers are concerned the agency will set rules tougher than those set by Congress or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Michigan Democrat Carl Levin had tried to win some protection for Detroit automakers by adding a statement that Congress and federal auto safety regulators have the final say over fuel economy rules. Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, who is the primary sponsor of the fuel economy provision said the energy bill is not intended to prevent state or federal governments from imposing additional greenhouse gas rules. In the end, the Senate dropped several other incentives aimed at helping the auto industry meet the new standards, such as a $25 billion loan guarantee program for updating assembly plants. California gasEnvironmental Protection Agency Administrator Stephen Johnson announced the rejection of the California request for a waiver under the Clean Air Act. “The Bush Administration is moving forward with a clear national solution not a confusing patchwork of state rules to reduce America’s climate footprint from vehicles,” Johnson said. California and 14 other states want to enforce greenhouse gas emission limits on cars and trucks starting with 2009 models. The principal target is carbon dioxide which is a byproduct of burning gasoline and diesel fuel. Automakers fought the state efforts contending that the industry could not comply with state-by-state rules. California plans to go to court to overturn the EPA ruling. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who is a Democrat from California, said, “We will examine this decision closely as part of our broader efforts to ensure America’s energy security.” Report Your Experience
|
||||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|