CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Feds Tell Tyson to Yank 'No Antibiotics' Labels

Medication in feed doesn't affect humans, company claims





By Truman Lewis
ConsumerAffairs.com

November 19, 2007

Food Safety
pepper photoEmergency Regs Needed for Tracking Produce, Food Groups Say
Nebraska Beef Recall Expanded to 5.3 Million Pounds
Consumer Group Presses Feds to Fix Food System
Kroger Expands Ground Beef Recall
Salmonella Outbreak is Biggest Ever Tied to Produce
E. coli Outbreak May Be Linked To Kroger Ground Beef
Salmonella: Trickier Than Imagined
Congressional Report Faults FDA Inaction
Tomatoes Off the Menu as Feds Search for Source
FDA 'Inaction' Blamed for Salmonella Outbreak
Restaurants Shun Tomatoes In Wake Of Salmonella Outbreak
FDA Warns Of Tomato-Linked Salmonella
USDA Bans Downer Cow Slaughter
CDC Links 2006 Salmonella Outbreak to Dog Food
---
More ...

Tyson Foods, the world's largest meat processor, has spent tens of millions of dollars this year advertising that its chickens are "raised without antibiotics."

But, like Kmart's lead-laden "lead-free" jewelry, Tyson's chicken products will have to change their labels.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) says it made a mistake back in May when it approved the Tyson labeling. The decision is a big blow to Tyson, which has staked its brand's reputation on the no-antibiotics claim.

The controversy revolves around medications added to poultry feed to keep chickens from getting intestinal infections that can cause weight loss and death in poultry.

The medication -- ionophores -- is not technically an antibiotic, Tyson said, insisting it's really an antimicrobial.

But in a letter to Tyson, USDA said its longstanding policy is that "ionophores are antibiotics," The Wall Street Journal reported.

Tyson claims the USDA has known all along that it was using ionophores but senior government officials said they only learned of it recently.

The USDA has given Tyson 45 days to change its labels but Tyson says it will be submitting a new label application. It wants its modified label to explain that ionophores can't cause antibiotic resistance in humans.

That's because ionophores are fully metabolized by the chickens before they are slaughtered and wrapped in plastic, the company said.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 9 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.