NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Employment    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Pets    Shopping    Travel   



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

FTC Renews Call for Cigarette Testing

Current tar, nicotine ratings 'may be misleading'





November 15, 2007


Turning The Tables On Big Tobacco
Senate Approves Bill For FDA Tobacco Regulation
Florida Smoker's Widow Awarded $30 Million
Court Finds Tobacco Companies Lied About Smoking Dangers
California Reinstates Tobacco Fraud Class Action
House Votes to Give FDA Regulatory Power Over Tobacco
Massachusetts Okays Cigarette Class Action Against Philip Morris
House Bill Would Give FDA Tobacco-Regulating Power
Tobacco And Alcohol Worse in Combination
Menthol Cigarettes May Be More Addictive
Supreme Court Clears Suits Over Light Cigarettes
Adult Smoking Rates Show Slight Drop
Racial Disparities Increasing For Cancers Unrelated to Smoking
Not Enough Doctors Trained to Help Smokers Quit
Secondhand Smoke May Hurt Children More Than Adults
Bank Stopped From Enabling Online Tobacco Sales
Study Finds Big Tobacco Exploiting Ad Ban Loophole
Do Tobacco Firms Cut Menthol to Hook Young Smokers?
Wegmans, DeCicco Markets Ditch Cigarettes
Secondhand Smoke Linked To Hospital Admissions
Anti-Smoking Drug Chantix Linked to Seizures, Heart Problems, Diabetes
Congress Moves To Tighten Tobacco Controls
Toddlers Affected Most By Secondhand Smoke at Home
Tobacco 'Innovations' Aimed at Younger Smokers
Heart Attacks Drop After Smoking Ban in Italy
Physician Highlights Hazards of Bartending
Anti-Smoking Suit Targets Restaurants
Smoking Linked to Sleep Disturbances
States Challenge R.J. Reynolds Cigarette Ads
Smokers Cost Taxpayers $10 Billion
Secondhand Smoke a Serious Health Risk
Would Women Rather Smoke Than Get Fat?
Kroger Agrees to Curb Tobacco Sales to Minors
No More Free Smokes in California
Second-Hand Smoke Tied to Lower Test Scores
Secondhand Smoke Bad for Pets
Researchers Link Smoking To Dementia
Smoking Turns On Genes -- Permanently
Bill Targets Online Cigarette Sellers
UK Tries Nicotine Patches on Pregnant Smokers
More Toxins Found in Smokers' Children
---
More about Smoking & Health

The Federal Trade Commission is once again calling for Congress to consider giving authority over cigarette testing to one of the federal government’s science-based public health agencies.

In testimony before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Commissioner William Kovacic discussed the FTC’s responsibilities in the area of tobacco advertising generally, and specifically explained cigarette testing and the promotion of cigarettes based on machine-measured tar and nicotine yields.

“One of the most challenging issues concerning cigarette advertising and promotion is ... the advertising and promotion of cigarettes based on their tar and nicotine yields as measured by the machine-based test methodology commonly referred to in the United States as ‘the FTC Method’" even though the FTC stopped using the test in 1987, Kovacic said in prepared testimony.

Kovacic said the test method, when first approved in 1967, “was intended to produce uniform, standardized data about the tar and nicotine yields of mainstream cigarette smoke, not to replicate actual human smoking.”

At the time, “most public health officials believed that reducing the amount of ‘tar’ in a cigarette could reduce a smoker’s risk of lung cancer; therefore, it was thought that giving consumers uniform and standardized information about the tar and nicotine yields of cigarettes would help smokers make informed decisions about the cigarettes they smoked,” he told the committee.

Humans breathe differently

But it turns out that actual human smokers don't breathe like the testing machines.

Research has shown that smokers change their smoking behavior to compensate for lower rated cigarettes, taking bigger, deeper, or more frequent puffs in order to achieve the dosage of nicotine they need, affecting the amount of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide they get from any particular cigarette, Kovacic said.

“The Commission has been concerned for some time that the current test method may be misleading to individual consumers who rely on the ratings it produces as indicators of the amount of tar and nicotine they actually will get from their cigarettes,” he added.

In a July 1999 report, and again in testimony given in 2003 and today, the FTC has recommended that Congress consider giving authority over cigarette testing to one of the federal government’s science-based public health agencies.

The testimony states, “Although the Commission brings a strong, market-based expertise to its scrutiny of consumer protection matters, it does not have the specialized scientific expertise needed to design and evaluate scientific test methodologies.”

Kovacic also detailed other FTC responsibilities in the area of tobacco advertising, noting that the Commission has used its authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act “to prosecute a variety of unfair and deceptive cigarette advertising practices -- including claims about tar and nicotine ratings for cigarettes.”

Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour issued a separate concurring statement, agreeing with the Commission’s recommendation that Congress consider giving authority over cigarette testing to one of the federal government's science-based public health agencies.

Harbour added, “I would also recommend that steps be taken to prohibit the use of any claims based on the Cambridge Filter Method -- also known as ‘FTC Method’ -- for testing tar and nicotine.”



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.



Asterpix

CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS

PRINT, ETC.

Print This

Email This


FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!

MOST-VIEWED PAGES

NEW COMPLAINTS

Hey there! ConsumerAffairs.com is using Twitter.
Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch throughout the day. Join today to start receiving ConsumerAffairs.com's updates.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.