CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Senate, FCC Chairman Spar Over Media Consolidation

Land-grab attitude permeates Washington as elections loom





by Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

November 9, 2007 

Consumer Groups Urge FCC to Reject XM-Sirius Merger
States Raise Questions about XM-Sirius Merger
XM-Sirius Merger Gets Antitrust OK
Senate, FCC Chairman Spar Over Media Consolidation
Wisconsin Seeks To Block Satellite Radio Merger
XM/Sirius Merger Gets a BoostWebcasters, Music Industry Reach Accord On Royalties
Karmazin "Clarifies" XM-Sirius Merger Plans
Last Minute Stay Of Execution For Web Radio
Dead Air Ahead: Court Denies Webcasters' Appeal
Notes From The Future Of Radio
Senators Throw Support Behind Internet Radio
Internet Radio Gets a Reprieve
Web Broadcasters Lose Music License Appeal
Feds Agree To Rethink Internet Radio Royalties
Reception Poor at Senate Sirius-XM Hearing
XM-Sirius Merger May Encounter Technical Difficulties
The End Of Internet Radio As We Know It
XM-Sirius Merger Encounters Serious Opposition
XM, Sirius Agree to Merge
Record Companies, Congress Take On Satellite Radio
Satellite Radio Looks Wobbly
---
Consumer Comments
Sirius
XM Radio

As Federal Communications Commission chair Kevin Martin travels to Seattle for hearings on his plans to relax rules on media ownership, several Senators have introduced a bill designed to slow down the plan long enough to solicit more public comments and review the plans in greater depth.

Martin has been strongly pushing for the FCC to review its study of media ownership rules and make changes by Dec. 18th, a move which roused criticism from media watchdogs, minority rights groups, and consumer activists.

They claim Martin is moving too fast and pushing rules changes to ensure major corporations and businesses could own multiple media outlets in the same region. Cross-outlet ownership in the same region has generally been prohibited by current rules, although there are numerous exceptions.

Rupert Murdoch, set to take over The Wall Street Journal, might have to sell The New York Post if the rules aren't relaxed. Although many media monoliths, including Tribune Co., have successfully won exemptions from cross-ownership rules, the big boys would like to have a freer hand.

At a rally in Washington, D.C. protesting Martin's move on the media ownership rules, FreePress.net executive director Josh Silver said that “We are gravely concerned that Chairman Martin would try to secretly move on such a critical issue with such a short timetable."

“The public is being shut out of the process so that Martin can move forward with his Big Media giveaway," Silver said.

Martin's plan led Senators such as Byron Dorgan (D-ND) to call on the Senate Commerce Committee to hold a hearing on the effects of media consolidation in markets and whether or not the plans are taking public wishes into account sufficiently.

Cooling-off period

Dorgan and Senator Trent Lott (R-MS) co-sponsored a bill that would impose a 90-day period for public comment on any legislation involving media ownership rules, and a separate set of hearings on how media consolidation affects local news coverage, with its own 90-day comment period.

The bill, cosponsored by Sens. Barack Obama (D-IL), Olympia Snowe (R-ME), John Kerry (D-MA), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA, also would require the FCC to establish a panel to investigate female and minority media ownership in the United States and provide accurate statistics that the FCC must consider before acting on any rules changes.

"We believe localism and diversity of media ownership is vital in a democracy," Dorgan said. "Our bill recognizes the importance of a wide range of media owners and local content, and requires a process that does not rush past those concerns to open the gates for even more consolidation of media ownership."

"Communities count on getting their local news from their locally-owned television stations and weekly and daily newspapers," Lott said. "They know 'locally-owned' means they're invested in their communities and care about their well-being."

Land grab?

Insiders claim that Martin's rush to institute the new rules is motivated by his political leanings. Martin, a Republican, is said to be concerned that if a Democrat wins the Presidency in the 2008 election, and Democrats pick up more seats in Congress, that the political environment may be even more unfavorable to any legislation that favors corporate consolidation of media outlets.

"Thus the land-rush fervor to let big media grab all it can before the new sheriff comes to town," said one longtime Washington operative.

"Big business has had the field to itself for the last seven years and there's now a feeling of desperation in the air -- sort of a get-it-before-they-nail-it-down attitude," he said.

The Seattle hearing is the last of six Martin convened for public discussion of the proposed changes to media ownership rules. The hearing was announced with only five days' notice, a move that FCC commissioners Jonathan Adelstein and Michael Copps, both Democrats, criticized as "quick and ill-considered" in a joint statement.

"A hearing with only five days notice is no nirvana for Seattle and the Pacific Northwest. This smells like mean spirit," the commissoners said, referring to Seattle grunge-rock legends Nirvana. "With such short notice, many people will be shut out. We received notice of the hearing just moments before it was announced. This is outrageous and not how important media policy should be made."



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.