CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Guidant Settles Defibrillator Charges For $16.7 Million

Thirty-six states sued company over wiring defects





September 1, 2007

Medtronic Withdaws Defibrillator Wires
Guidant Settles Defibrillator Charges For $16.7 Million
Court Orders Guidant To Release Documents
FDA Warns Guidant About Its Heart Devices
Spitzer Sues Guidant for Hiding Defibrillator Defect
FDA Report Addresses Heart Device Malfunctions
Potentially Harmful Medical Devices Should Be Recalled, Public Citizen Tells FDA
FDA Knew Of Pacemaker Problems Before Recall
Guidant To Resume Defibrillator Sales
Guidant Recalls Pacemakers
Guidant Pacemakers May Be Recalled
FDA Upgrades Guidant Recalls
Guidant Finds More Defibrillator Problems
FDA Recalls Guidant Implantable Defibrillators
Company Withheld News of Flaw in Defibrillator
Medicare To Cover More Defibrillators

Medical device manufacturer Guidant has agreed to settle a multi-state lawsuit over its Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator medical device for $16.7 million. The devices were recalled in 2005.

The settlement resolves allegations that Guidant failed to disclose to the medical community wiring failures in Guidant-made ICDs called the Ventak Prizm 2 DR Model 1861. It also resolves allegations that after making modifications to correct the wiring problems in 2002, Guidant continued to sell the original, unmodified devices into 2003.

ICDs are devices that doctors surgically implant in a patient’s chest to monitor for abnormal heart rhythms. If a patient’s heart stops, the ICD delivers an electrical surge to start it again.

The Indianapolis-based Guidant is among the world’s three largest makers of ICDs. Its related corporate entities, Guidant Sales Corporation and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., are also party to the settlement.

Currenty, Guidant is conducting a warranty program to provide consumers who wish to replace their Ventak Prizms with a new device at no cost, and to reimburse consumers up to $2,500 for any out-of-pocket expenses they incur with the replacement.

As part of the settlement, Guidant has agreed to extend its warranty program for an additional six months. Of the total $16.7 million being paid by Guidant to the states, approximately $1 million will be used to reimburse warranty program participants for expenses they incur beyond the $2,500 threshold.

“As a result of this agreement, Guidant will create the position of patient safety officer staffed by a physician, and will take other steps to ensure that patient safety is always a priority,” New Jersey Attorney General Anne Milgram said. “Guidant will also be more accountable concerning the performance of its products.”

“We want to make sure this life-saving tool is as safe as possible, and that patients and doctors get the information they need about any safety problems,” added North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper.

Cooper and 35 other attorneys general began investigating Guidant when they learned that the company made changes in 2002 to correct a wiring problem that could cause the Prizm to short circuit but continued to sell the old model.

If the Prizm short-circuited, it could fail to deliver a life-saving jump-start to a patient’s heart when needed. Guidant kept selling unmodified Prizms even after making two separate changes to correct the problem, and did not tell doctors or the public until May 2005 that it sold Prizms with wiring problems in 2002 and 2003.

Under terms of the settlement, Guidant has agreed, among other things, to do the following:

• Establish a patient safety advisory board consisting of independent experts to evaluate data concerning ICD performance;

• Establish a patient safety officer position, staffed by a physician whose primary responsibility is to advance ICD patient safety;

• On a quarterly basis, publicly disclose and disseminate specific information, including worldwide failure data, survival probability estimates and current information in the event of any U.S. Food and Drug Administration recall of an ICD;

• Post a notice on its Web site within 30 days of any modification to any of its ICDs to correct a failure pattern;

• Solicit the return of out-of-service ICDs

• Maintain a data system to track the serial numbers, implant dates and removal dates of all ICDs that Guidant distributes in the United States.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 5 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.







Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.