Movieland Defendants Settle FTC Charges

Pop-ups sought payment, claiming consumers had used up their 'free trial'

September 14, 2007

Movieland.com • Movieland Defendants Settle FTC Charges • Movieland.com Sued for Spyware • Movieland Denies It Pipes Spyware Onto Users' Computers • Complaints about Movieland • Complaints about Moviepass.tv

Movieland, a long-running scourge of computer users, has settled Federal Trade Commission charges that its practices violated federal law.

Movieland downloaded software that spawned pop-up messages claiming consumers had signed up for a “free trial” that had expired, and demanding payment to make the messages go away.

The consent agreement requires the defendants to provide a way for consumers to remove the software, bars future downloads without consumers’ consent, and requires the defendants to pay more than $500,000 for consumer redress.

In August 2006, the FTC filed a complaint in U.S. district court charging that the operators of the movieland.com, moviepass.tv, and popcorn.net Web sites downloaded software that repeatedly disrupted consumers’ computer use with a sequence of large pop-ups, accompanied by music, that lasted nearly a minute and could not be closed or minimized.

According to the complaint, these pop-ups demanded that consumers pay the defendants as much as $99.00 to end the recurring pop-up cycle, claiming that consumers had signed up for a three-day “free trial” to use the defendants’ Internet download services and had not cancelled their “license” before the trial period ended.

Hundreds of consumers complained to the FTC. Many claimed they had never signed up for the “free trial” and had never even heard of the Internet download services until they got their first demand for payment.

The FTC charged that the defendants made it difficult or impossible for consumers to uninstall the software.

Consumers attempting to remove the software through the Windows Control Panel Add/Remove function allegedly were redirected to a Web page telling them that they had to pay a fee to stop the pop-ups.

According to the FTC, the only way many consumers could regain control of their computers was to pay the defendants to stop the pop-ups, or pay a computer technician to help them. The FTC charged that the scheme was unfair and deceptive and violated federal law. The settlement announced ends the litigation.

The settlement prohibits the defendants from using the Internet to offer “anonymous” free trials with a negative-option feature. It also bars the defendants from misrepresenting that a consumer has consented to receive pop-up payment demands and from misrepresenting that consumers are obligated to pay the defendants.

In addition, the settlement bars the defendants from using the Internet to download software to consumers’ computers without their consent, restricts the number of pop-up windows or banners the defendants’ software can display regarding a consumer’s purported payment obligations, and requires that such pop-ups contain a mechanism to allow a consumer to close them and to silence any accompanying audio.

The settlement also bars the defendants from attempting to conceal their software from consumers and bars them from downloading software that automatically reinstalls itself after consumers have removed it.

It requires that the defendants’ software programs include a mechanism to allow consumers to remove them and requires that the defendants post uninstall instructions on the movieland.com, moviepass.tv, and popcorn.net Web sites.

The defendants also must stop the recurring billing enrollment of consumers who have not, within the past 60 days, accessed the content on their Web sites and must e-mail the uninstall instructions to those consumers.

The FTC complaint named Digital Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Movieland.com; Triumphant Videos, Inc., d/b/a Popcorn.net; Pacificon International, Inc., d/b/a Vitalix; Alchemy Communications, Inc.; AccessMedia Networks, Inc.; Innovative Networks, Inc.; Film Web, Inc.; Binary Source, Inc., d/b/a Moviepass.tv; Mediacaster, Inc., d/b/a Mediacaster.net; CS Hotline, Inc.; Easton Herd; and Andrew Garroni. The Commission also voted to amend the complaint to add as defendants Frostham Marketing, Inc.; and Longview Media, Inc.

More Scam Alerts ...

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share		Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |