CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Webcasters, Music Industry Reach Accord On Royalties

Agreement averts a shutdown of smaller Web broadcasters





by Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

August 25, 2007 

Consumer Groups Urge FCC to Reject XM-Sirius Merger
States Raise Questions about XM-Sirius Merger
XM-Sirius Merger Gets Antitrust OK
Senate, FCC Chairman Spar Over Media Consolidation
Wisconsin Seeks To Block Satellite Radio Merger
XM/Sirius Merger Gets a BoostWebcasters, Music Industry Reach Accord On Royalties
Karmazin "Clarifies" XM-Sirius Merger Plans
Last Minute Stay Of Execution For Web Radio
Dead Air Ahead: Court Denies Webcasters' Appeal
Notes From The Future Of Radio
Senators Throw Support Behind Internet Radio
Internet Radio Gets a Reprieve
Web Broadcasters Lose Music License Appeal
Feds Agree To Rethink Internet Radio Royalties
Reception Poor at Senate Sirius-XM Hearing
XM-Sirius Merger May Encounter Technical Difficulties
The End Of Internet Radio As We Know It
XM-Sirius Merger Encounters Serious Opposition
XM, Sirius Agree to Merge
Record Companies, Congress Take On Satellite Radio
Satellite Radio Looks Wobbly
---
Consumer Comments
Sirius
XM Radio

Internet radio broadcasters and SoundExchange, the music industry's royalty collection division, have hammered out an accord to cap royalty payments that would have put all but the largest Web radio stations out of business.

The Digital Media Association (DiMA), representing Internet radio broadcasters such as Pandora and Live365, and SoundExchange agreed to limit royalty payments for record labels to $50,000.

The music industry had originally convinced the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board to adopt a royalty structure that would have set minimum payments for royalties at $500 per station, pushing payments into the million-dollar range.

“This agreement is a clear sign of progress in the ongoing negotiations between webcasters and SoundExchange and a very good first step toward a viable solution, but it is just the beginning," said Jake Ward, spokesperson for the SaveNetRadio coalition in a statement. "As the negotiation of recording royalty rates and terms continues, SaveNetRadio urges everyone involved to work in good faith toward a resolution.”

Under the terms of the agreement, Internet radio broadcasters would have to maintain a detailed census of the songs they play on all stations at all times.

Both sides agreed to continue discussions regarding the implementation of digital rights management (DRM) technology into radio streams, to prevent listeners from downloading songs or streams to their computers for later use.

The factions also did not reach an agreement on the actual royalty rate structure itself. Under the new rate structure approved by the CRB, Webcasters would have to pay a small percentage of royalties per song, while other broadcasters such as satellite radio pay fixed percentages of the revenues they earn.

The new rate structure, written almost entirely by SoundExchange, inspired a massive wave of grassroots protests, forcing the CRB to delay implementation of the new rates. In the intervening time, members of Congress in both houses proposed legislation to overturn the new rates and restore the old royalty payment system, or offer payment structures similar to satellite radio.

The threat of Congressional involvment moved the music industry to offer a stay of execution after the royalty deadline passed on July 15, so that both sides could sit down and negotiate better terms.

Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), a co-sponsor of the "Internet Radio Equality Act" in the Senate offered cautious praise for the compromise.

“We are encouraged by the good faith efforts represented by this initial agreement," Wyden said in a statement. "It is a promising first step in the negotiation process which we are hoping will make our legislation unnecessary."



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.