|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters Spanish |
|
|
![]() |
Congress Finds Fault With FAA's Slow Fixes |
||||||
|
By Dan Schlossberg July 26, 2007
In addition to long hours, heavy workloads, and inadequate staffing, they face a myriad of other problems that wears them to a frazzle – and contributes to the cancellations and delays that cause consternation for consumers daily. That’s the word from a congressional committee charged with overseeing the nation’s sagging aviation infrastructure. The release of the committee’s report triggered a sharp retort from the government agency responsible for controlling the controllers. The House Aviation Subcommittee blames the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for dragging its feet in upgrading facilities for controllers, while the FAA says the same committee is interfering with its attempts to upgrade outdated facilities. According to the committee, the FAA spent less than 25 per cent of the money it was allotted for maintenance: $60 million out of more than $250 million in available funds. The congressional report also said some of the facilities used by air traffic controllers have health-threatening problems, including mold and asbestos, as well as conditions that could render obsolte equipment useless (water dripping onto computers from leaky roofs). Such charges bother Rep. Jim Oberstar, the Minnesota Democrat who chairs the overall Transportation Committee for the House. He told reporters he found the FAA’s failure to move aggressively during a time of increasing delays and cancellations to be "astounding." Although the FAA says it has the funding to finance short-term fixes, that may not be sufficient, multiple sources say. The agency’s objective of tracking planes with Global Positioning System satellites would be a vast improvement over the current radar-based system and would certainly reduce the growing number of delays but won’t be ready for years. In the meantime, consumers are caught in the crossfire while Congress and the FAA fight over the future of flight. Even though the immediate feature looks far from rosy, the FAA says flight safety was never compromised. Report Your Experience
|
||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|