|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters Spanish |
|
|
![]() |
Apple Denies iPhone Nano ReportsLower-Priced iPhone May Be in the Works |
|||||
|
By Mark Huffman July 11, 2007
At least that’s the opinion of an industry analyst, who says a new model, based on Apple’s iPod Nano, might sell for less than $300. Kevin Chang, an analyst for JPMorgan Chase, based in Taipei, says Apple has recently filed a patent for such a device. He also says unnamed parts manufacturers have confirmed his hunch. Apple has declined comment. The patent Chang refers to describes a multifunctional handheld device with a circular touch control wheel. In a note, he said he expects to see the device on the market soon. However, other analysts who cover Apple are not so sure consumers will see a low-cost alternative to the iPhone anytime soon. Chang’s New York colleague, JPMorgan Chase’s Bill Shope, says the patent more likely reflects Apple’s plan to eventually add communications capabilities to its next generation iPods. He says that for Apple to move so quickly to bring a new product online defies its historical business patterns. The Apple iPhone went on sale June 29, commanding prices of $499 and $599, depending on memory size. Sales estimates for the two days range from 250,000 units to 525,000. There were early complaints over “activation issues,” as many consumers who stood in line to buy one of Apple’s new iPhones had difficulty in getting it to work. “Your activation requires additional time to complete,” many consumers reported being told. Normally, a mobile phone is activated by personnel in the retail store where it is purchased. But with the anticipated sales volume for the new device, Apple and AT&T devised a plan whereby consumers would activate the phones themselves, connecting the phone to their computers and using Apple’s iTunes to complete the process. AT&T said the system worked as planned for the vast majority of consumers but conceded some customers experienced “activation issues.” Postings on Apple message boards complained of the difficulty of transferring service from an existing AT&T account to a new iPhone. An AT&T spokesman said those attempting to transfer a corporate account to their new iPhone might have encountered extra difficulties. Report Your Experience
|
|||||
Back to the top | |
||||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|