|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Light Trucks Vulnerable to WhiplashInsurance Institute Finds Most Trucks, SUVs Fall Short |
|||||||||||||
|
By Joe Benton July 23, 2007
Head restraints in dozens of sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks and minivans fell short in simulated crashes conducted by the insurance group. The IIHS reported that the simulated rear crashes at 20 mph showed that many large vehicles did not adequately protect against neck injuries, which lead to 2 million insurance claims a year. The test results found that several SUVs had improved protections against whiplash injuries, but the IIHS gave poor marks to vehicles made by several automakers, including BMW AG, DaimlerChrysler AG, Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp., Nissan Motor Co. and Toyota Motor Corp. But David Zuby, vice president of vehicle research for the IIHS, said the test results showed there was plenty of room for improvement. "In stop-and-go commuter traffic, you're more likely to get in a rear-end collision than any other crash type," said Zuby. "It's not a major feat of engineering to design seats and head restraints that afford good protection in these common crashes." Neck injuries are the most common reported in auto crashes, accounting for 2 million insurance claims annually, according to IIHS. Safety experts say the head and torso must move together to minimize the risk of whiplash. Head restraints must be high enough and close to the back of the head, and seats should meet certain stiffness criteria. The institute's tests included measuring seat geometry and simulating crashes at 20 miles per hour using a dummy designed to measure neck forces. Performances were rated either poor, marginal, acceptable or good. In the 2007 evaluation, 17 of 59 SUV models were rated good and five were acceptable. The remaining 37 were marginal or poor. In 2006, only six of 44 SUVs earned good ratings. In vans, three were rated good and two acceptable. In pickups, one model posted a 'good' score, while five were acceptable. The remaining 11 were marginal or poor. The redesigned 2007 Tundra from Toyota was the only pickup that received a good rating. The best performers among 2007 SUVs included the Acura MDX and RDX; Lincoln MKX; Ford Edge; Honda CR-V, Element and Pilot; Hyundai Santa Fe; Jeep Grand Cherokee, and Volvo XC90. SUVs from the 2007 model year rated poor included the GMC Envoy, BMW X3 and X5 and the Toyota 4Runner and Highlander. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|