CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

FDA Advisory Panel Rejects Advice To Pull Avandia





July 31, 2007

Diabetes
Studies Find Link Between Diabetes and Alzheimer's
Avandia Maker Failed To Report Required Data
Prediabetes: What You Should Know
Study: Large-Breasted Women More Diabetes-Prone
U.S. Diet Dishes Up Diabetes
Weight-Loss Surgery Seen Beneficial to Diabetics
Lack of Deep Sleep May Increase Diabetes Risk
Study: Avandia May Do More Harm than Good
FDA Orders New Warning For Avandia
U.S. Kidney Disease on the Rise
Fish Oil May Fight Diabetes
Avandia vs. Actos: A Doctor's Advice
Avandia Linked to 42% Greater Risk of Heart Attack
Soft Drink Sweetener Linked to Diabetes in Kids
Diabetes Drugs to Get 'Black Box' Warnings
FDA Rejects Advice to Pull Avandia From Market
FDA Advised to Pull Avandia From Market
Avandia, Other Diabetes Drugs Increase Risk of Heart Failure
Dairy Products May Protect Against Metabolic Syndrome
Portion-Control Dishes May Help Obese Diabetics
FDA Issues Safety Alert on Diabetes Drug Avandia
Stem Cell Treatment May "Cure" Diabetes
Diabetes Risk May Be In The Genes
Holiday Gluttony Can Spell Disaster for Undiagnosed Diabetics
Malaria Drug May Fight Common Cause of Diabetes, Heart Disease
Feds Attack Fake Diabetes Cures
FDA Approves New Treatment for Diabetes
Feds Warn Of Counterfeit Diabetes Tests
Study: Weightlifting Helps Overweight Teens Avoid Diabetes
Researchers Say They Can Reverse Type 1 Diabetes
Study: Obesity Major Factor in Diabetes Epidemic
Too Much, Too Little Sleep Linked To Diabetes In Men
Procedure Cures Some Diabetic Mice
Ethnicity Skews Diabetes' Effect on Heart
Pig Cells May Be Useful in Diabetes Treatment
Protein Triggers Fat-Saturated Cell Death
FDA Approves Diabetes Inhaler Exubera
FDA Panel Greenlights Diabetes Inhaler
Breastfeeding May Decrease Diabetes Risk
Low-Fat Dairy Products May Lower Diabetes Risk in Men
Scientists Find Diabetes "Switch"
New Diabetes Treatment Approved
Knowledge of Diabetes Doesn't Always Affect Outcomes
Moderate Exercise Helpful to Diabetes-Prone Women
Life Expectancy Increases; Diabetes Epidemic Worsens

Despite the recommendation of an Food and Drug Administration safety scientist and Public Citizen experts, an FDA advisory panel says the diabetes drug Avandia should remain on the market.

The FDA's David Graham told FDA advisors Monday the drug appears to increase risks of a heart attack. The advice was contained in a slide, which was part of a presentation made to the advisory group but released in advance of the meeting.

Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of the Health Research Group at Public Citizen, detailed pre-approval and post-approval evidence of cardiac toxicity, liver toxicity and anemia. Wolfe also discussed post-approval evidence of increased bone fractures in women and damage to patients' vision associated with the drug.

"Does the overall risk-benefit profile of Avandia support its continued marketing in the United States?" said Wolfe. "The answer is clearly no."

Adverse Reactions

According to Wolfe's testimony, in FDA adverse reaction reports filed since marketing began for the drug in 1999 through the end of last year, there was a 15.2 times higher adjusted rate of heart failure reported with Avandia than for the older diabetes drug Glucotrol. The adjusted rate of liver toxicity with Avandia was 9.5 times higher, and 14.8 times higher for liver failure.

In addition, the adjusted rate of post-approval adverse reaction reports for anemia in patients was 13.3 times higher for Avandia than with Glucotrol. In patients already damaged by heart failure or other cardiac risks associated with the drug, the addition of anemia could significantly worsen their clinical condition, Wolfe warned.

Wolfe also cited in his testimony a recently completed study finding statistically significant increases in bone fractures in women using Avandia compared to those using another diabetes drug.

After listening to Graham’s presentation, the advisory panel agreed there may be heart risks associated with the drug, but voted to reject his advice. Several members did call for a stronger warning label.

43% Higher Risk

Graham cited research to make his argument that there is no evidence of major health benefits from taking the drug, and that leaving it on the market may “cost thousands of lives.” The study in the New England Journal of Medicine linked Avandia with a 43 percent higher risk of heart attacks.

Earlier, government safety scientists advised the FDA that Avandia shouldn't be used in combination with insulin or by patients with heart disease.

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists issued a statement in support of the advisory panel recommendation, saying it agreed Avandia should stay on the market, for now.

“Physicians can continue to treat persons with diabetes who are well-controlled with Avandia, knowing that it has been shown useful and effective in controlling glucose, a crucial step to preventing diabetes complications,” the group said in a statement.

“AACE will continue to support the development of approaches to manage the issues of weight gain, of fluid retention, and of reduced bone mass in diabetic patients receiving both Avandia and Takeda’s pioglitazone (Actos), to optimize clinical decision-making in the appropriate use of these important glucose-lowering medicines.”

Vision Impairment

Wolfe said that vision impairment, a major complication of diabetes, is also made worse by Avandia. A mechanism related to heart failure and fluid accumulation has produced macular edema - a swelling in the retina - in many patients, causing usually reversible damage to vision. The adjusted reporting rate for macular edema was 35.3 times higher for Avandia than for Glucotrol.

"There is no evidence of any uniquely beneficial clinical outcome for Avandia and growing evidence of unique risks in multiple organ systems," concluded Wolfe. "If Avandia were up for approval today, based on what is now known, it would be summarily rejected. There should not be a double standard for removing it from the market."

Because of the dangers associated with the drug that are not present in older, safer diabetes medications, Public Citizen is preparing a petition to the FDA to remove Avandia from the market.

Approved in 1999

Avandia was approved in 1999 for treatment of type 2 diabetes, a serious and life-threatening disease that affects about 18 to 20 million Americans. Diabetes is a leading cause of coronary heart disease, blindness, kidney failure and limb amputation.

Since the drug was approved, FDA said it has been monitoring several heart-related adverse events based on signals seen in previous controlled clinical trials of Avandia alone and in combination with other drugs, and from postmarketing reports.

The agency updated the product's labeling on several occasions to reflect these new data, most recently in 2006.

The most recent labeling change for Avandia also included a new warning about a potential increase in heart attacks and heart-related chest pain in some individuals using Avandia. This new warning was based on the result of a controlled clinical trial in patients with existing congestive heart failure.

The U.S. government is looking into safety concerns about the diabetes treatment drug Avandia, with a top safety scientist urging that it be pulled from the market.

David Graham, a safety scientist with the Food and Drug Administration, told FDA advisors Monday the drug appears to increase risks of a heart attack.

The advice was contained in a slide, which was part of a presentation made to the advisory group but released in advance of the meeting.

Graham cited research to make his argument that there is no evidence of major health benefits from taking the drug, and that leaving it on the market may “cost thousands of lives.” The study in the New England Journal of Medicine linked Avandia with a 43 percent higher risk of heart attacks.

Earlier, government safety scientists advised the FDA that Avandia shouldn't be used in combination with insulin or by patients with heart disease.

GlaxoSmithKlein, the maker of Avandia, disputed Graham’s findings. The company said many studies have already been conducted, involving thousands of subjects, and that “there is no consistent or systematic evidence that Avandia increases the risk of heart attacks or death from cardiovascular disease compared to other drugs.

Avandia was approved in 1999 for treatment of type 2 diabetes, a serious and life threatening disease that affects about 18 to 20 million Americans. Diabetes is a leading cause of coronary heart disease, blindness, kidney failure and limb amputation.

Since the drug was approved, FDA said it has been monitoring several heart-related adverse events based on signals seen in previous controlled clinical trials of Avandia alone and in combination with other drugs, and from postmarketing reports.

The agency updated the product's labeling on several occasions to reflect these new data, most recently in 2006.

The most recent labeling change for Avandia also included a new warning about a potential increase in heart attacks and heart-related chest pain in some individuals using Avandia. This new warning was based on the result of a controlled clinical trial in patients with existing congestive heart failure.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.