CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Senators Throw Support Behind Internet Radio



By Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 11, 2007

Consumer Groups Urge FCC to Reject XM-Sirius Merger
States Raise Questions about XM-Sirius Merger
XM-Sirius Merger Gets Antitrust OK
Senate, FCC Chairman Spar Over Media Consolidation
Wisconsin Seeks To Block Satellite Radio Merger
XM/Sirius Merger Gets a BoostWebcasters, Music Industry Reach Accord On Royalties
Karmazin "Clarifies" XM-Sirius Merger Plans
Last Minute Stay Of Execution For Web Radio
Dead Air Ahead: Court Denies Webcasters' Appeal
Notes From The Future Of Radio
Senators Throw Support Behind Internet Radio
Internet Radio Gets a Reprieve
Web Broadcasters Lose Music License Appeal
Feds Agree To Rethink Internet Radio Royalties
Reception Poor at Senate Sirius-XM Hearing
XM-Sirius Merger May Encounter Technical Difficulties
The End Of Internet Radio As We Know It
XM-Sirius Merger Encounters Serious Opposition
XM, Sirius Agree to Merge
Record Companies, Congress Take On Satellite Radio
Satellite Radio Looks Wobbly
---
Consumer Comments
Sirius
XM Radio

Two Senators have introduced legislation that would overturn a decision that threatens to put Internet radio broadcasters and stations out of business due to crippling new royalty payments.

The "Internet Radio Equality Act" would vacate the recent ruling by the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) that hiked payment rates for performances 300 to 1200 percent, and would reinstate the current standard of paying 7.5 percent of the broadcaster's revenue.

The Act's co-sponsors, Sens. Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), spoke of the need to support independent Web services that are built off Internet radio broadcasts.

“Keeping Internet radio alive is part of a broader issue that is important to me -- keeping the e-commerce engine running by preventing discrimination against it," Wyden said in a statement.

Brownback, a Senate Judiciary Committee member and Republican presidential candidate, said he was "alarmed by the recent Copyright Royalty Board decision and the effect it will have on Internet radio – especially small Webcasters with limited revenue streams. I am hopeful that with this bipartisan legislation Internet radio will continue to flourish."

The Senate bill joins companion legislation in the House.

Reps. Jay Inslee (D-WA) and Donald Manzullo's (R-IL) bill would also vacate the CRB decision and return to the previous payment standard. Inslee and Manzullo hailed Brownback and Wyden for introducing the bill, with Rep. Manzullo noting how the issue has garnered great attention from constituents.

"Since we introduced our legislation in the House two weeks ago, I have been inundated with messages from Internet radio listeners throughout the country thanking me for protecting this wonderful medium," Rep. Manzullo said. "This issue has ignited a flurry of passion from music lovers throughout our country, and I again thank Senators Wyden and Brownback for their efforts to help keep the music playing on the Internet.”

The CRB had originally scheduled the new rates to take effect on May 15, retroactive to the beginning of 2006, but agreed to extend the rate hike date to July 15, giving opposition efforts such as the "Save Net Radio" coalition more time to lobby Congress to pass legislation and to raise awareness of the issue.

Save Net Radio spokesperson Jay Ward thanked the Senators for taking action and urged a quick passage of the bill.

"We commend Senators Wyden and Brownback for their understanding of Internet radio’s importance and for their leadership in taking the steps needed to save it,” Ward said.

The new CRB royalty rates were largely crafted by SoundExchange, the royalty collections division of the recording industry. They would require that royalties be paid for streaming a single song to a single listener. The cumulative effects of the royalty payments would be too much for all but the biggest Internet radio sites to handle, putting them out of business.

The new rules also mandate flat minimum payments to be paid for any streaming in addition to the royalty payments, and the rules' breadth affects radio broadcasters ranging from National Public Radio (NPR) to Internet radio broadcaster Pandora.

NPR tried to appeal to the CRB to review the decision, but was denied. The network filed an appeal in Washington, D.C. district court to stop the new rules from taking effect.

Pandora founder Tim Westergren, one of the leaders in opposing the CRB decision, praised Brownback and Wyden for their legislative efforts.

"[Brownback and Wyden's] support shows an understanding of the invaluable exposure that Internet radio provides to emerging artists, as well as an acknowledgment of the diverse listening experience it offers to music lovers. We are hopeful that, with the Senators' support, this promising industry will finally be treated fairly so that it can continue to grow."



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!







Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.