|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
|
|
![]() |
Illinois Demands Removal of Cocaine Drink from Store Shelves |
||||||
|
May 3, 2007
The attorney general made the demand in a letter sent to California-based Redux Beverages, LLC, the manufacturer and distributor of the product. “This is a product that glamorizes illegal drug use and it is highly irresponsible and reckless,” said Madigan. “The State of Illinois will not tolerate its sale, especially to children.” Advertisements for the drink describe it as the “legal alternative” to the street drug cocaine and promote the use of an ingredient in the drink that creates a burning sensation to simulate the throat-drip effect of using cocaine. The company is actively promoting the product and recently hosted a “Cocaine Energy Drink Launch Party” in Chicago. “I'm concerned about this product because of the name it's marketed under and because of its contents,” said Dr. Whitaker. “Calling an energy drink cocaine and marketing it to kids elevates an illegal drug and contradicts the message that kids need to stay away from drugs. I'm also concerned with the amount of caffeine in this drink because excessive amounts of caffeine can be harmful and cause headaches, anxiety, nausea and even seizures.” In December 2006, prior to distribution and promotion of the drink in Illinois, Madigan contacted Redux to voice her concern that the energy drink would have a detrimental effect on consumers and may promote the use of illicit drugs, especially among young people. There has been no response from the company. Madigan also informed Redux that if any Illinois consumer purchased this product she may take enforcement action against the company. Madigan said the marketing and sale of “Cocaine” is in violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act because it promotes the use of illegal drugs. She also said it violates the Illinois Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act because the company is marketing an unapproved new drug. Under the laws, Madigan’s office has the authority to obtain injunctive relief and civil penalties. Madigan has successfully pursued enforcement action against manufacturers of similar products such as Chronic Candy Pops, commonly referred to as “pot suckers.” Her action in 2005 stopped the sale of the product in Illinois. Report Your Experience
|
|
|||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|