CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

FDA Panel Rejects Vioxx Replacement





April 13, 2007

COX-2 Drugs
Bextra
Celebrex
Vioxx
---
News
Celebrex May Disrupt Heart Rhythm
FDA Rejects Arcoxia As Arthritis Drug
FDA Panel Rejects Vioxx Replacement
FDA Panel Members Indebted to Drug Companies
COX-2 Painkillers Restricted in Europe
Researchers Ignored Early COX-2 Warnings
FDA to Improve Drug Safety Monitoring
FDA Convenes COX-2 Meeting
FDA Blasts Ads For Celebrex, Bextra
Feds Issue Caution On All COX-2 Drugs
British Heart Patients Told to Stop Taking Cox-2 Drugs
Researchers Warn of Dangers

Merck & Co. appears unlikely to win approval for a new arthritis drug after a Food and Drug Administration advisory panel voted overwhelmingly to keep it off the market. Merck had hoped to make Arcoxia a replacement for the withdrawn Vioxx.

Both drugs are so-called Cox-2 inhibitors. Vioxx was withdrawn from the market in September 2004 after tests showed it doubled the risk of heart attack and strokes in people taking it.

In making its recommendation, the FDA panel said it could see no value in making Arcoxia available to arthritis sufferers. In fact, panelists said it likely posed the same cardiovascular risks as Vioxx and other Cox-2 drugs that have been pulled from the market.

The drug maker has promoted Arcoxia as safe as other pain relievers on the market and argued that it would be a valuable alternative for arthritis patients who have few other options.

Since Vioxx was withdrawn, Merck has faced a barrage of lawsuits charging injury and wrongful death. The FDA has faced mounting criticism over its drug approval process, with critics charging Vioxx should never have been approved in the first place.

The FDA panel vote rejecting Arcoxia was 20-1.

Merck withdrew Vioxx in 2004, following indications that it can contribute to serious cardiovascular events including heart attacks and strokes.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 5 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.







Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.