CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Merck Wins Vioxx Case In Illinois





March 27, 2007

Related Stories

First Vioxx Judgment Overturned On Appeal
Merck Agrees to Pay $58 Million to Settle Vioxx Claims
Researchers Claim Merck Cooked Vioxx Data
Common Pain Relievers May Boost Muscle Mass
More Painkillers Can Cause More Pain
Merck Caves, Agrees To $4.85 Billion Vioxx Settlement
New York Sues Vioxx Maker over Drug’s Risks
Merck Wins Vioxx Case In Illinois
Judge Rules Out Vioxx "Super" Class Action
FDA Critic Blasts Merck's Vioxx Replacement
Merck Loses New Orleans Vioxx Case
Merck Wins Latest Vioxx Suit
Vioxx Study Authors Backtrack On Claim
Older Painkillers May Increase Heart Attack Risk
More about Vioxx
---
Other NSAIDs
Bextra
Celebrex
Dangers of Other Vioxx-Type Drugs
Vioxx Alternatives
Aleve Ingredient Seen as Health Risk

A 52-year old Granite City, Illinois woman, Patricia Schwaller, had taken Merck's arthritis drug Vioxx for nearly two years before suffering a fatal heart attack in 2003. But a jury in Edwardsville, Illinois acquitted the drug company, finding Vioxx did not cause her death.

The jury rejected the plaintiff's case that Vioxx was a bad drug, with defects in its design and not enough testing before being approved as a painkiller.

Instead, the seven men and five women found that Merck had provided ample warnings about Vioxx's risks, and that Schwaller's physician was well aware of them when he prescribed the drug.

Merck's lawyers argued there were other, more probable causes of Schwaller's heart attack. They maintained her family had a history of the ailment, that she was morbidly obese, suffered from high blood pressure and diabetes, and lived a sedentary life style.

Merck has refused to entertain offers of a Vioxx settlement and has insisted so far on trying each case against it separately. In trials that have produced a jury verdict, the pharmaceutical giant has notched ten acquittals against five defeats. It faces at least 27,000 more lawsuits over the once-popular arthritis drug.

Vioxx was withdrawn from the market in September 2004 after a clinical trial showed that it doubled the risk of heart attack and strokes in patients who took it for at least 18 months.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 6 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.