CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters   Spanish


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Company Sues Feds For Release Of Safety Data

Taxpayer-Owned Information Hidden from the Public




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

March 27, 2007

NHTSA Posts "Early Warning" Safety Data on the Web
Court Upholds Public Access to Crash Data
Company Sues Feds For Release Of Safety Data
Feds Asked to Reverse Auto Safety "Secrets" Rule
NHTSA's Dirty Little Secrets
Consumer Group Sues For Release of Recall Data ---
Auto Safety News

A safety research company has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit in federal District Court in Washington, seeking publicly-owned data about deaths and injuries that is being concealed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

R.A. Whitfield, Director of Quality Control Systems Corp., said that the public needs access to the Early Warning Reports collected under the Transportation Recall Enhancement Accountability and Documentation (TREAD) Act to better understand why so many deaths and injuries related to tire failures in the Ford Explorer have continued long after the well-known tire recalls that affected the vehicle.

The data was gathered at taxpayers' expense and is being withheld from public view by federal employees whose salaries are paid by the taxpayers from whom the information is being withheld.

The TREAD Act was passed in October 2000 in response to Ford Explorer-Firestone tire-related rollover deaths in the U.S. and Ford's overseas recalls. TREAD amended federal transportation law to require vehicle and equipment manufacturers to report safety recalls or campaigns on vehicles and components in a foreign country if they also sold substantially similar products in the U.S.

The law also required NHTSA to create regulations governing quarterly Early Warning Reports -- information on property damage and warranty claims, consumer, dealer and field reports, production numbers and deaths and injuries collected by manufacturers -- with the intent of using the data to spot defect trends.

When President Bill Clinton signed the bill into law, he directed NHTSA "to implement the information disclosure requirements of the [TREAD] Act in a manner that assures maximum public availability of information."

But after six years of crafting regulations, and after three years worth of data, the public has consistently been denied access to the information, the suit charges.

Between July 1994 and January 15, 2007, at least 420 persons have been killed in tire-related, Ford Explorer, Mercury Mountaineer, and Mazda Navajo crashes, including 396 deaths found in NHTSA's Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and 24 recent deaths found in news accounts. For more than a year, Whitfield has been seeking Ford's EWR death and injury data on Explorers to better analyze the rise in tire-related Explorer fatalities.

While available fatal crash data frequently do not report vehicle component failures, the TREAD Act requires manufacturers to separately report claims about deaths and injuries related to alleged component failures. Whitfield wants to merge the two sets of information together to get a better picture of the problem.

Whitfield and others, most notably Public Citizen, seeking Early Warning Reports say they have been stymied by NHTSA's decision to keep nearly all the data secret.

"It is truly outrageous that the Bush administration would move to seal such essential auto safety information from the public," said Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen and former NHTSA administrator. "Public access to this type of data could mean the detection of problems like the deadly Ford Explorer/Firestone tire combination and could save lives."

Since 2000, safety and consumer advocates and manufacturers have fought over what -- if any -- of the information collected under the TREAD Act is public. The safety community has pushed for maximum accessibility.

"The government shouldn't be the sole arbiter of safety -- with a small staff and limited budget NHTSA should welcome independent evaluations of the EWR data as part of its mandate to protect the public," says Sean Kane, president of Safety Research & Strategies, which commissioned Quality Control Systems to examine the increase in Explorer tire-related fatal crashes.

"Data are critical to understanding and seeking solutions to safety problems -- Explorer tire-related crashes is just one of many issues that would benefit from evaluation of the data NHTSA is keeping secret."

Tire Makers Object

The Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) has insisted that the TREAD Act specifically exempted EWR data from public view under Exemption 3 of the Freedom of Information Act. (Exemption 3 states that information is not public under FOIA if Congress specifically passes a law preventing its release.)

NHTSA has consistently argued that some EWR information should be kept confidential under FOIA's Exemption 4 -- information that may cause competitive harm. In January 2001, when the agency began to establish the EWR regulations, it envisioned making much of the information -- including death and injury data -- public and received few requests from manufacturers for confidentiality. But as some manufacturers fought tenaciously for secrecy, NHTSA designated more classes of information private under Exemption 4.

In March 2004, Public Citizen sued Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta over the confidentiality of EWR data. The suit claimed that NHTSA had deviated substantially from its initial proposal when it passed a final rule that broadly determined that whole classes of tire data are confidential.

The Rubber Manufacturers Association, which represents tiremakers, filed counter claims. In March 2006, U.S. District Judge Robert Leon ruled in favor of Public Citizen and directed NHTSA to revisit the rule. Judge Leon ruled a week later that EWR data was not subject to FOIA Exemption 3. The RMA appealed.

As the rule stands today, only death and injury and property damage claims filed with the government through EWR are supposed to be made public. But NHTSA has refused to release any of the data until RMA's appeal is resolved.

In the meantime, the death toll in Ford Explorer, tire-related crashes rose in 2005, at the rate of about one death per week, and other potential safety problems loom without public knowledge.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

October 11 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!






Back to the top |

Advertisement


AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Class Actions
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.