CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Illinois Sues Mortgage "Rescue" Companies



April 8, 2005

Mortgage "Rescuers"
Eviction
California Shuts Down Mortgage Scam Artists
FTC Takes On Mortgage 'Rescue' Operations
Illinois Uses New Law to Sue Mortgage Rescue Company
Washington State Settles with Mortgage "Rescuers"
Scams and Foreclosures On the Rise
Illinois Sues Mortgage "Rescue" Companies
Mortgage Crisis? Act Now to Avoid Foreclosure
North Carolina Shuts Down Mortgage "Rescue" Operation
Illinois Shuts Down Mortgage "Rescue" Scam
Indiana Fines Mortgage "Rescue" Firm
Illinois Sues Another Mortgage Foreclosure "Rescuer"
Missouri Sues Foreclosure "Rescue" Business
Illinois Launches Offensive Against Foreclosure "Rescuers"
New York Takes On Predatory Real Estate Scams
Texas Halts Bogus Foreclosure Rescue Operation

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan has filed suit in Cook County Circuit Court against multiple businesses and individuals who operated a mortgage rescue scheme that allegedly targeted Illinois homeowners facing mortgage foreclosure.

The suit, filed against Eyes Have Not Seen, Inc. (EHNS), its president, Charles T. White, Jr., Debra Gray and Darius K. Monroe as agents of EHNS, Mutual Trust Funding, formerly known as Greater Investment Solutions, Inc., and Creative Financial Solutions, alleges that the defendants violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act and the Credit Services Organization Act, by misleading homeowners into participating in transactions that the defendants falsely promised would save the homes from foreclosure.

"Mortgage rescue fraud artists, like these defendants, take advantage of homeowners who are in financial distress," Madigan said. "Instead of fulfilling their promises to help, these defendants take away the homeowners' hard-earned equity, destroying the financial health of these families. We are working aggressively to investigate and prosecute these frauds."

The suit alleges that EHNS and White, operating at 800 South Wells Street in Chicago, preyed on homeowners in financial distress and on the verge of foreclosure by convincing them to put their homes in someone else's name and obtain a new mortgage.

According to the complaint, EHNS and White approach homeowners who are struggling to pay their monthly mortgage payments and tell the homeowners that if they put their home in someone else's name for a certain period of time, the homeowners will not have to pay the monthly mortgage payments and can use that time period to restore their financial health and rebuild their credit record.

EHNS and White encourage the homeowners to put the home in the name of either a relative who has a good credit history or a third party recommended by EHNS and White. This "investor" becomes the mortgagor on a new mortgage taken out on the home.

EHNS and White represent to both the homeowners and investors that EHNS will pay the monthly mortgage payments on the new mortgage for a period of time. Based on these representations from EHNS and White, homeowners agree to take out new mortgages on their homes that are far larger than the existing mortgage.

Contrary to EHNS' and White's representations that they will help the homeowners save their home, the defendants proceed to craft a transaction that significantly worsens the homeowners' financial plight.

Working with Mutual Trust Funding, Inc., at 120 West Madison Street, Suite 1305 in Chicago and Creative Financial Solutions, at 55 West Monroe Street, Suite 500 in Chicago, EHNS and White pay off the homeowners' existing loans with funds from new mortgages on the homes and take the equity that the homeowners have built up in their homes.

The new mortgages are significantly larger than the previous mortgages and have a value far in excess of what the homes are worth. Consequently, the new monthly mortgage payments are higher than the homeowners' old mortgage payments.

Despite their promises to pay the new monthly mortgage payments, EHNS and White often fail to make these payments, leaving the homeowner or the investor to make the payments on the new mortgage. Homeowners who had been experiencing difficulty making mortgage payments before being approached by EHNS and White are unable make the even higher payments for the new mortgage and, thus, they fall into foreclosure.

Madigan's complaint alleges that through this scheme, EHNS and White strip the homeowners of their home equity and walk away with a substantial amount of money at the time of the loan closings. In the thirteen consumer complaints against the defendants filed with Madigan's Consumer Fraud Bureau, Illinois homeowners lost from $28,174.02 to $85,000 at the closings arranged by the defendants.

To make this scheme work, the defendants obtain the new, excessive mortgage loans using falsified loan documents. In some instances, the defendants create fake lease agreements, fake pay-stubs and income tax returns to deceive the lenders into believing that the investors have a sufficient stream of income to qualify for a loan when, in reality, the investors would not qualify based on their accurate employment and financial information.

Madigan's lawsuit asks the court to enter a permanent injunction order, prohibiting the defendants from engaging in the mortgage brokering and mortgage foreclosure rescue businesses in Illinois. The suit also asks the court to order the defendants to make full restitution to homeowners and to pay civil penalties of $50,000 for each violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and the Credit Services Organization Act, and civil penalties of $10,000 per violation committed against a person 65 or older.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.