CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters   Spanish


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Feds Charge Mystery Shopping Promoters

FTC Seeks Court Order, Contempt Charges Against Defendants



March 26, 2007


Mystery ShoppingFeds Charge Mystery Shopping Promoters
Secret Shopper Scams Infest Arizona
Arkansas AG Warns Of Mystery Shopper Scams
Taking the Mystery Out of Mystery Shopping
---
Scam Alerts

Promoters who told consumers they could be hired as mystery shoppers and earn a substantial income, and the telemarketing firm working for them, are facing Federal Trade Commission charges that their claims about job availability and income potential were deceptive.

The FTC also charged the mystery shopping operation with contempt for violating a previous FTC order, and is seeking redress for consumers, who lost millions of dollars.

The FTC alleged that in exchange for the $99.95 fee for one year of service, consumers thought they would be trained and certified as mystery shoppers, and would gain access to job postings available through the company, with enough paid assignments available to ensure a steady part-time or full-time income.

Instead, consumers received a worthless certification and access to re-postings of other mystery shopping assignments posted by other companies, who were unrelated to the defendants. Consumers still had to apply for these jobs, most of them low-paying, and had no advantage over anyone else who found the postings elsewhere for free.

According to the FTC, the defendants misrepresented that:

• the operation itself was hiring mystery shoppers, or hiring mystery shoppers on behalf of others;

• there were a specific number of mystery shopping jobs available in the consumers' area;

• a large percentage of mystery shopping jobs go unfilled due to a lack of mystery shoppers; and

• consumers who paid the defendants' fee were likely to earn a substantial income.

The promoters advertised in newspapers, radio, and cable television, inviting consumers to call a toll-free number for more information. The telemarketers assured consumers that there were a specific number of mystery shopping jobs available in their area, often a number in the hundreds or even thousands, and that consumers could make as much money as they wanted by deciding how many assignments to accept.

The telemarketers promised consumers that they would make from $200 to $500 a week, and would earn their money back within one to two weeks. They also told consumers that there was a shortage of mystery shoppers in their local area, allowing them to pick and choose from the large percentage of shopping assignment that go unfulfilled.

In fact, there was no shortage of mystery shoppers. There were far fewer jobs available than what consumers were told, most were low paying, and very few consumers who signed up even made enough money to cover the fee.

While the agency has reason to believe that the operation recently stopped making sales, the FTC is asking a District Court to enter an order barring the defendants from making the deceptive claims, in case they start up sales again.

The FTC complaint names the companies and individuals responsible for the mystery shopping operation -- Mystery Shop Link, LLC, Tangent Group, LLC, Robin Larry Murphy, Kenneth Johnson, and Andrew Holman -- and those responsible for the telemarketing firm that handled the majority of the inbound telemarketing calls from consumers responding to the ads -- Harp Marketing Services Inc., Aiden Reddin, and Marc Gurney.

In addition, the FTC is charging the defendants behind the mystery shopping operation with contempt. Robin Larry Murphy is already under FTC order from FTC v. Stratified Advertising and Marketing, Inc. In that case, the FTC charged the defendants falsely pitched the availability of government jobs in consumers' chosen fields and geographic location and misrepresented to consu

More Scam Alerts ...

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

October 12 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!






Back to the top |

Advertisement


AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Class Actions
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.