CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

"Free Medicine" Marketer Settles FTC Charges

My Free Medicine Targeted Low-Income Consumers



By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

March 16, 2007


Read More Scam Alerts ...

A company that lured low income consumers with no insurance into spending $199 by claiming they would receive free prescription medications has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that its marketing violated federal law.

In addition to prohibiting deceptive claims, the settlement bars My Free Medicine and its principal from accepting payment from consumers without first providing a clear and conspicuous written notice that discloses the terms and conditions of their services. The settlement also contains a suspended $500,000 judgment.

In September 2005, the FTC charged that the defendants targeted low income consumers who spent more than $100 a month for medications and who might qualify to receive free prescription medicine through one or more of the many patient assistance programs -- PAPs -- operated by pharmaceutical companies.

The PAPs impose varying eligibility requirements on consumers and not all drugs are available through these programs. Those that are may only be available for limited times, or in certain doses.

The complaint alleges that defendants used radio and TV ads to urge consumers who were not covered by insurance to call a toll-free number to find out if they were "eligible" to receive free prescription medications.

Defendants' sales reps routinely told consumers that they were eligible to receive free prescription medication and that their medications were available through their program. The sales reps also told consumers that the company dealt directly with pharmaceutical companies and the federal government to obtain free prescription medications for consumers, and that the company would provide the medication directly to the consumers or to their doctors.

In fact, the company simply provided consumers with PAP application forms that had to be submitted to the pharmaceutical companies. After paying $199.95 for a six-month enrollment in defendants' program, many consumers learned that they were not eligible to receive their prescription medications for free from a PAP, or that their prescriptions were not available from a PAP.

At the request of the FTC, a U. S. District Court in Seattle, Washington, ordered a halt to the deceptive claims, and froze the defendants' assets, pending trial. The settlement announced today resolves that litigation.

The settlement imposes a permanent prohibition on deceptive claims about any medical services program, including claims about eligibility for PAP programs, availability of specific medications, the assistance the defendants provide, and their refund policy. It also bars the defendants from accepting payment from consumers without first providing a clear and conspicuous written notice that discloses the terms and conditions of their services and informs consumers that they can access PAPs directly, that the defendants only provide assistance in applying for PAP benefits, that PAPs set their own eligibility requirements, and that payment of a fee to the defendants does not guarantee that a consumer will receive medication from a PAP.

The settlement also requires that defendants disclose, in writing, the terms and conditions of their refund policy.

The settlement imposes a judgment of $500,000, which has been suspended based on the defendants' inability to pay. Should the court find that the defendants misrepresented their financial condition, the entire $500,000 will become immediately due and payable.

Finally, the settlement contains standard record-keeping and other provisions to allow the agency to monitor compliance with its order.

The defendants in this case are MyFreeMedicine.com, LLC ("MFM") and its principal Geoffrey Hasler. They are based in Louisville, Kentucky.

More Scam Alerts ...

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 5 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.