|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Carmakers Want to Exclude Public From Tailpipe Standards Trial |
|||||||||||||
|
By Joe Benton March 16, 2007
The auto industry is questioning whether Vermont can impose the new California standards on vehicle tailpipe emissions. Now the automakers say they need to protect trade secrets, including sales forecasts and engineering data and that, therefore, the public ought to be excluded from some of the court proceedings. The stakes are enormous for automakers. Nine states have adopted the California rules that require passenger cars to meet new tailpipe standards that would cut emissions up to 40 percent by 2016. Meeting the requirement would mean the auto industry would have to improve fuel economy to average approximately 40 miles per gallon for passenger cars. U.S. District Judge William K. Sessions has scheduled a hearing to exclude the public after the Burlington, Vermont, Free Press objected to the automakers' request. The industry would like to bar the public from hearing some testimony as well as keep almost 150 court exhibits private. As part of the proposal to limit access, the auto industry offered to release edited daily transcripts of testimony that exclude the most confidential information. Each automaker, including General Motors Corp., DaimlerChrysler, Ford Motor Co. and Toyota Motor Corp. has reviewed or turned over thousands of pages of sensitive documents. Many of the documents contain detailed engineering and financial assessments involved with fuel economy changes and technologies in specific vehicle models. The automakers are claiming the information is proprietary and they ought to be allowed to keep it away from public view. The federal court proceeding in Vermont is a result of the 2002 California decision to order that automakers meet strict tailpipe emissions limits beginning in 2009. The automakers contend the California order is unreasonably expensive and will lead to declining vehicle sales and the closure of some automobile dealerships. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|