|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Texas Trips Up "Smiling Bob"Dietary Supplement Peddlers Agree to Refunds |
|||||||||||||
|
February 5, 2007
Texas authorities said the commercials touted deceptive "free trial" offers. An agreement with Steve Warshak, owner of all five companies, provides refunds to consumers deceived by the misleading practices. The settlement covers 15 products, including Altovis, Mioplex, Numovil and Enzyte, the last of which was known for its "Smiling Bob" television commercials. "Texans will not tolerate falsely advertised, unproven healthcare supplements," said Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott. "We are committed to cracking down on companies that make false claims about dietary supplements. This judgment ensures that appropriate restitution is available to the good folks who were deceived by these defendants." Abbott filed suit in June 2005 against Warshak and his five companies -- Berkley Premium Nutraceuticals Inc.; Lifekey Inc.; Boland Naturals Inc.; Warner Health Care; and Warner Nutraceuticals. The defendants agreed to end the deceptive "free trial offers" that persuaded consumers to order the supplements. Once consumers received the product, the companies began billing them automatically without their consent. Further, the defendants instructed consumers to take the supplements for 90 days or risk not achieving all the products' supposed beneficial health effects. In fact, the 90-day period's true purpose was simply to exceed the trial period and thereby encourage consumers to purchase the defendants' goods. Many consumers found it difficult, if not impossible, to cancel shipments or obtain refunds. Warshak and his companies enticed consumers by falsely claming his products could cure diseases. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not approved any of the products for use as drugs, and no scientific studies support Warshak's claims. Under the settlement, Warshak will pay $350,000 in civil penalties and attorneys' fees to the State. Warshak also agreed to refrain from deceptively promoting his products. Additionally, the defendants are prohibited from offering "free" product trials unless the promotions clearly give consumers a way to cancel after the trial period ends. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|