CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Airline Report Card Keeps Getting Worse





By Dan Schlossberg
ConsumerAffairs.com

February 11, 2007

Be a Traveler, Not a Target
Money Solutions for the Traveler
Travel News

With several airlines emerging from bankruptcy and merger mania apparently on the back burner for the moment, carriers were convinced they'd get a better report card from the federal government.

They were wrong.

The 2006 year-end report issued by the Department of Transportation (DOT) says on-time arrivals are down and baggage problems are up. The document shows both at alarming levels, especially for an industry that has slammed the public with higher fares two dozen times in the last two years.

Passengers are paying more for less: 11,200 per day reported mishandled bags in 2006, boosting the year's total beyond four million. Though only a 1 per cent increase over 2005, it's still the worst rate since 1990.

The percentage of on-time arrivals is only slightly better, the report says. The rate of 75.5 per cent would be just enough to get a baseball player elected to the Hall of Fame but is hardly enough to keep the airline industry out of the Transportation Hall of Shame.

The last time the on-time arrival late was so poor was in 2000, the year before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 threw the nation's transportation network into a mad scramble for survival.

Struggling to survive the economic consequences, airlines have cut costs by reducing staff and fleet size -- issues that directly impacted the traveling public.

According to the DOT, overbooked planes caused more passenger bumping and boarding denials in 2006 than in 2005.

There were also more checked bags, especially late in the year after British authorities thwarted a terrorist plot involving planes bound for the United States.

Especially bad marks went to Atlantic Southeast, operating a Delta Connection, and Chicago O'Hare, which operated on-time 66 and 69 per cent of the time, respectively. At the top of the DOT's charts were Frontier (81 per cent on-time) and Salt Lake City (86 per cent on-time departures).

Although the DOT conceded that bad weather was responsible for numerous delays, its report also blamed high traffic volume, maintenance issues, and turnaround time.

The only area where airline performance improved over the year before, the DOT said, was in the number of consumer complaints.

Perhaps consumers are tired of taking the time to complain about a system that seems to need a total overhaul. Many have accepted bad airline service as a fact of life.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 7 2008




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.