NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Employment    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Insurance    Pets    Shopping    Travel     Print This     Email This    



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Feds Propose New Auto Safety Tests

Too Many Cars Getting Five Stars




Advertisement

By Joe Benton
ConsumerAffairs.com

January 9, 2006

Auto Safety

Study: Vision Checks Cut Fatal Accidents
Is Your Vehicle Child-Proof?
Teen Misjudgment Major Factor in Highway Accidents
New Auto Safety Legislation Aims to Protect Children
Insurance Group: Supersport Motorcycles Deadly
Feds Consider Tougher Auto Safety Ratings
Congress Urged to Protect Children from Vehicle Deaths
Motorcycle Death Rates Rising, Safety Chief Warns
Feds to Require Additional Minivan Door Latch
Survey: Teens Still Driving Dangerously
Feds Propose Recorders to Monitor Truckers' Hours
Feds Propose New Auto Safety Tests
Consumers Choosing Tiny Cars Despite Safety Risks
IIHS: Bigger is Better in Car Safety
NHTSA's Dirty Little Secrets
Feds Find Backup Sensors Ineffective
Simpler Dashboards Might Make Cars Safer
States Struggle to Cut Highway Fatality Rate
Ford Makes Stability Control Standard for 2009
Feds Require Safety Info on New Car Window Stickers
Motorcycle, Pedestrian Deaths Rising
Safer Cars, Not Safer Drivers, Reducing Highway Deaths
Former Lobbyist in Driver's Seat at NHTSA
Must-Have Safety and Convenience Features for New Car Shopping
More ...

Federal regulators plan to make it harder for vehicles to earn top marks for auto safety in the government's five-star rating system, hoping to provide a little more meaning for consumers shopping for a safe vehicle.

Regulators want fewer models to receive the top five-star rating in an effort to reward vehicles that carry more safety features.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters said the move will toughen frontal, side and rollover tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

"Eighty-seven percent of the cars on the market today get a five-star rating, so it doesn't allow the differentiation between those who are advancing some of the new technologies and others that are not," Peters said. "We're raising the bar and increasing the standards so that we can push the bar always for safety."

DOT is not demanding new legal requirements from automakers but is proposing to change how auto safety will be measured and reported.

"Everyone knows the old adage 'wrapping the car around the telephone pole,'" Peters said. "We want to re-create this kind of crash to show how side air bags can protect the driver's head during this type of crash."

A major problem with the current testing program is that nearly every vehicle passes. Fully 87 percent of 2006 vehicles received four or five stars for side impact crashes and 95 percent earned top marks for frontal crashes.

Joan Claybrook, president of the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen and a former NHTSA administrator, said that the proposed new standards don’t go far enough.

"A rollover crashworthiness test evaluating roof crush and ejection was still not included in determining the rollover safety rating," Claybrook said, adding that the standards ignore important crashworthiness elements such as passenger ejection as well as the size disparity between passenger cars and light trucks.

In recent years, tougher crash tests conducted by outside groups such as the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety have received more attention than the government tests as wells as pointing out safety flaws in some vehicles that won top marks in government tests.

IIHS has adjusted crash tests requirements to make them tougher. Automakers must pass front and side crash tests, protect against whiplash injuries in rear-end accidents as well as offer electronic stability control in order to earn top marks . "Vehicles are much better at protecting passengers but we are still losing a lot of people," said Adrian Lund, president of the IIHS. "My concern is it doesn't go as far as we'd like."

Under the NHTSA proposal, safety regulators will employ smaller dummies to represent female drivers, increase speeds in some crash tests and add to the weight of crash barriers to account for heavier vehicles on the roads.

NHTSA will also give automakers a letter grade for how quickly they add advanced technology systems to vehicles, including electronic stability control, lane departure systems and rear-end collision avoidance.

The agency will hold a public meeting March 7 in Washington to take questions and comments about the proposed standards.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share

Follow us on Twitter.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.