CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

FTC Fines Weight-Loss Pill Pushers

Companies Pay $25 Million, Agree to Limit Ad Claims





January 4, 2006

'Western' Diet Increases Heart Attack Risk Globally
CSPI Raps Nickelodeon Food Ads
New Study Links Inactivity to Desire for More Food
Researchers Suppress "Hunger Hormone"
Parents Can Shape Childrens' Eating Habits
Overweight Doesn't Always Mean Unhealthy
Exercise in a Pill?
Study: 86 Percent of Americans Could Be Obese by 2030
Americans Becoming Even More Obese, CDC Says
New Guide Lists Calories in Beer, Wine, Cocktails
Experts Fact-Check 'McDonald's Diet' Story
Dementia Linked To Obesity
Study Ties Obesity, Inflammation to Heart Failure
Doctor Offers Antidote To 'Super-Size Me' Diet
Eating Disorders Widespread Among U.S. Women, Survey Finds
Obesity A More Costly Workplace Health Issue Than Smoking
A 'Healthy Weight' May Not Be So Healthy
Skipping Breakfast May Lead to Obesity
Obesity Blamed for Rising Stroke Rate in Women
Spanish Language TV Linked To Latino Child Obesity
Fast Food+Sedentary Lifestyle=Liver Damage
Artificial Sweeteners Linked to Weight Gain
Mississippi May Ban Restaurant Sales to the Obese
Eat Less or Exercise More?
Researchers Find 'Fat-Burner' Compounds
Obesity Linked to Decreased Seatbelt Use
Low-Calorie Food Prices Surge
Italian Restaurants Serve Up the Fat
Viral Infections May Promote Obesity
Brits Find Obesity Deadlier Than Smoking
Healthy Restaurants May Bring Out Bad Eating Habits
'Bad Carbs' Not the Enemy, Researcher Argues
New Pill May Make Weight Loss Safer
---
Weight Loss News
Childhood Obesity

Four promoters of weight control pills are losing fiscal heft the hard way. The marketers of Xenadrine EFX, CortiSlim, TrimSpa, and One-A-Day WeightSmart will pay $25 million to settle federal charges that their advertising claims were not supported by scientific evidence.

The companies are also agreeing to limit their claims in the future.

"You won't find weight loss in a bottle of pills that claims it has the latest scientific breakthrough or miracle ingredient," said FTC Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras. "Paying for fad science is a good way to lose cash, not pounds."

Xenadrine EFX

Two marketers of Xenadrine EFX will pay at least $8 million and as much as $12.8 million to settle FTC allegations that Xenadrine EFX's weight-loss claims were false and unsubstantiated. The funds will be used for consumer redress.

In a bankruptcy case not involving the Commission, the defendants have also agreed to pay at least an additional $22.75 million to settle claims brought by creditors and consumers, including personal injury claims for an earlier ephedra-based product.

Xenadrine EFX, which contains, among other ingredients, green tea extract (EGCG), caffeine, and bitter orange (Citrus aurantium), was advertised heavily in print and on television, including in such publications as People, TV Guide, Cosmopolitan, and Men's Fitness. Xenadrine EFX advertising also appeared in Spanish-language publications.

The FTC's complaint alleged that the defendants made false or unsubstantiated claims for Xenadrine EFX, including that it was clinically proven to cause rapid and substantial weight loss and clinically proven to be more effective than leading ephedrine-based diet products.

According to the complaint, Robert Chinery commissioned several studies of Xenadrine EFX, none of which showed substantial weight loss. The complaint alleged that in one of these studies, subjects taking Xenadrine EFX lost an average of only 1.5 pounds over the 10-week study, while a control group taking a placebo lost an average of 2.5 pounds over the same period.

The complaint also alleged that Xenadrine EFX advertisements falsely represented that persons appearing in the ads achieved the reported weight loss solely by using Xenadrine EFX. According to the FTC complaint, consumer endorsers lost weight by engaging in rigorous diet and/or exercise programs. In addition, the endorsers were paid from $1,000 to $20,000 in connection with their testimonials; according to the complaint, Xenadrine EFX advertisements failed to disclose those payments.

CortiSlim and CortiStress

The seven marketers of CortiSlim and CortiStress will surrender, in total, assets worth at least $12 million to settle FTC charges that they made false and unsubstantiated claims that their products can cause weight loss and reduce the risk of, or prevent, serious health conditions.

In the final three settlement agreements announced today, the FTC will recover $8.4 million in cash, along with proceeds from the sale of a residence acquired with CortiSlim profits.

In two earlier settlement agreements, the defendants turned over $1.5 million in cash, a boat, a truck, a real estate interest, and proceeds from a tax shelter. The funds recovered from the seven defendants will be used for consumer redress.

The advertising campaign for CortiSlim ran nationwide, including ads on broadcast and cable television, radio, print media, and the Internet.

The FTC's complaint alleged that advertising claims about CortiSlim's ability to cause rapid, substantial, and permanent weight loss in all users were false or unsubstantiated, as were claims about CortiStress's ability to reduce the risk of osteoporosis, obesity, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.

The FTC also alleged that CortiSlim and CortiStress infomercials were deceptively formatted to appear as talk shows rather than advertisements.

TrimSpa

The marketers of TrimSpa will pay $1.5 million to settle FTC allegations that their weight-loss claims were unsubstantiated.

According to the FTC's complaint, the marketers had inadequate scientific evidence to support their advertising claims that TrimSpa causes rapid and substantial weight loss and that one of its ingredients, Hoodia gordonii, enables users to lose substantial amounts of weight by suppressing appetite.

Many ads for "TrimSpa Completely Ephedra Free Formula X32" featured testimonials. Celebrity Anna Nicole Smith claimed to have lost 69 pounds in eight months by using TrimSpa. Other advertising claims included "Your high speed dream body diet pill" and "It makes losing 30, 50, even 70 pounds (or however many pounds you need to lose) painless."

TrimSpa ads appeared on television, in magazines, on radio, and in local newspapers. TrimSpa was also promoted on a Web site, at some NASCAR events, and other live events.

One-A-Day WeightSmart

The Bayer Corporation will pay a $3.2 million civil penalty to settle FTC allegations that advertisements for One-A-Day WeightSmart multivitamins violated an earlier Commission order requiring all health claims for One-A-Day brand vitamins to be supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

Bayer ran a national advertising campaign for One-A-Day WeightSmart, which contains EGCG (epigallocatechin gallate), a green tea extract. Bayer also advertised on television, radio, and the Internet, and in newspapers and magazines, such as RedBook, Family Circle, and TV Guide.

Advertising claims included statements such as:

"Just in! Most women over 30 can gain 10 pounds a decade, due in part to slowing metabolism.… So eat right, exercise, and take One-A-Day WeightSmart. The complete multi-vitamin with EGCG to enhance metabolism."

"One-A-Day WeightSmart. The first and only complete multivitamin with an ingredient to enhance your metabolism. EGCG, a natural green tea extract, to help you while you manage your weight."

The complaint alleges that Bayer Corporation marketed One-A-Day WeightSmart with unsubstantiated claims that it

• increases metabolism;
• enhances metabolism through its EGCG content;
• helps prevent some of the weight gain associated with a decline in metabolism in users over age 30; and
• helps users control their weight by enhancing their metabolism.

The FTC alleges that these unsubstantiated claims violate a 1991 Commission order against Bayer's predecessor, Miles Inc., that require all claims about the benefits of One-A-Day brand products to be substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

In addition to the $3.2 million civil penalty, Bayer is prohibited from violating the FTC order and from making unsubstantiated representations regarding the benefits, performance, efficacy, safety, or side effects of any dietary supplement, multivitamin, or weight-control product.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

November 21 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

PRINT, MAIL, ETC.


FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!

MOST-VIEWED PAGES

  • Classmates
  • GM-Viagra
  • Sharper Image
  • Sears Auto Centers
  • GE Money Bank
  • Maytag Washers
  • Speed Up Your Metabolism
  • Chinese Formula
  • Aspire
  • Wal-Mart Vision Centers
  • Whirlpool Water Heaters
  • NEW COMPLAINTS

  • Babystyle.com
  • Petro Oil
  • Thane Steamer
  • Thane Vacuum
  • Covergirl
  • Paula Young Wigs
  • Family Dollar
  • Bon Ton Stores
  • Firefly
  • Maidenform.com
  • Hey there! ConsumerAffairs.com is using Twitter.
    Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch throughout the day. Join today to start receiving ConsumerAffairs.com's updates.







    Back to the top |

    Advertisement



    AUTOMOTIVE
    • Dealers
    • Manufacturers
    • Service
    • Extended Warranties
    • Lemon Laws
    • Recalls
    • Tires
    • Transporters

    FAMILY
    • Aging
    • Children, Parenting
    • Recalls
    • Dating
    • Education
    • Entertainment
    • Pets
    • Weddings
    FINANCE
    • Annuities
    • Banks
    • Credit Cards
    • Debt Collection
    • Debt Counseling
    • Insurance
    • Investing
    • Loans
    • Mortgages
    • Payday Loans
    • Student Loans
    • Tax Prep

    HEALTH
    • Drugs, Pharmacies
    • Health Clubs
    • Hearing Care
    • Hospitals
    • Nursing Homes
    • Nutrition, Diets
    • Vision Care
    • Weight Loss
    HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS
    • Appliances
    • Cookware
    • Furniture
    • Home Improvements
    • Lawn & Garden
    • Movers
    • Pools & Spas
    • Realtors, Rental Agents
    • Recalls
    • Utilities

    ELECTRONICS
    • Cable TV/DBS
    • Cameras
    • Cell Phones
    • Computers
    • Home Electronics
    • Internet Access
    • Local Phone Service
    • Long Distance
    • VoIP
    SHOPPING
    • In-Home
    • Online
    • Retail Stores
    • Sporting Goods
    • Supermarkets
    • Telemarketers

    TRAVEL
    • Airlines
    • Bus Lines
    • Car Rental
    • Cruises
    • Hotels
    • Travel Agents
    • Trains

    RESOURCES
    • Class Actions
    • Complaint Form
    • Small Claims Guide
    • Lemon Laws
    CONSUMER NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Automotive
    • Telecom
    • Financial
    • Health
    • Homeowners
    • Scams
    • Seniors
    • Travel
    • More ...

    RECALLS
    • Automotive
    • Children's Products
    • Drugs
    • Food
    • Household Products
    • Sporting Goods

    ABOUT US
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • Newsroom
    • Syndication
    • Terms of Use

    Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

    Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

    Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

    For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

    Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.