Complain about a product or service

FTC Charges Express Consolidation Misleads Consumers

January 9, 2007

Credit Counseling • FTC Charges Home Buying Operation With Credit Repair Scheme • FTC Charges Express Consolidation Misleads Consumers • Debt Free Agrees to West Virginia Refunds • Ohio Sues "Credit Counselor" For Deceiving, Threatening Consumers • Debt Management Telemarketers Settle FTC Charges • FTC Shuts Down 20 "Credit Repair" Schemes • FTC Sues "Debt Elimination" Programs • AmeriDebt Founder Settles FTC Charges for $35 Million • IRS Plans to Yank Tax-Exempt Status of 20 Credit Counselors • IRS Revokes Tax-Exempt Status of Four Credit Counseling Agencies • Three Debt Management Firms Settle Federal Charges • AmeriDebt To Close as Part of FTC Settlement • Credit Counseling Riddled With Fast-Buck Promoters, Congress Finds • Credit Counselors Not Always What They Seem • Credit Counseling Scams On the Rise • Lenders Ratchet Down Payments to Credit Counselors --- • More about Credit Counseling

A nationwide debt consolidation business violated federal law by misleading and illegally telemarketing millions of consumers, according to the Federal Trade Commission. The company operates under the names Express Consolidation, Express Consolidation Inc., and Consumer Credit Consolidation Inc.

According to the FTC's complaint, the scheme, which bills itself as "America's Premier Debt Consolidation Company" is violating the FTC Act and the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), led by a Florida attorney who is using a sham nonprofit company to violate telemarketing rules that exempt legitimate nonprofit entities.

According to the complaint, the defendants have violated the FTC Act and the TSR by falsely claiming:

• that they are a nonprofit entity;
•that the only cost for their services is a monthly administrative fee that is less than $49 and/or that there is no application fee;
•that their services will result in estimated savings of a specified amount, typically several thousand dollars; and
•that their services will reduce the consumer's monthly payment or total debt, or will improve their credit rating.

In fact, the complaint states, in addition to a monthly administrative fee, the defendants charge a fee equal to the monthly payment, which is collected from the consumer's first payment; they overstate the estimated savings, if any; their services do not necessarily reduce the consumer's monthly payment or total debt; and they do not provide any service to improve, or prevent deterioration of, a customer's credit record, history, or rating.

The complaint contends that the defendants also violated the TSR by failing to disclose the program's total costs, and by telling consumers that certain payments are refundable without disclosing all the limitations of the program's refund policy.

The defendants' other alleged TSR violations are calling telephone numbers listed on the Do Not Call Registry, calling consumers who have stated they do not wish to receive such calls from the defendants, failing to pay the fee to access the Registry, and "abandoning calls."

According to the complaint, the defendants have used computerized telemarketing services for "voice broadcasting," the delivery of recorded messages to telephone answering machines and voice mail services. The TSR requires that such calls answered by a person be connected to a live representative within two seconds.

This restriction on abandoning calls by hanging up or playing a recording when someone answers applies to calls selling goods or services, and calls for charitable contributions.

As noted in the complaint, one telemarketer the defendants used is The Broadcast Team (TBT). TBT was sued by the U. S. Department of Justice in December 2005 at the FTC's request for TSR violations. According to the complaint, TBT caused almost 11 million abandoned calls on the defendants' behalf.

Urging consumers to contact the defendants, one recorded message delivered to answering machines stated, "We are a nonprofit agency that can consolidate your credit cards, lower your monthly payments dramatically, and reduce your interest rates down to as low as 1.5 percent."

The defendants also use mail and Web sites -- www.expressconsolidation.org and www.expressconsolidation.com -- to get consumers to contact them, the complaint alleges. Once consumers provide information about their debts, defendants' agents give consumers a specific monthly payment they would have to make to cover payments to creditors and the program's fee. These total monthly payments are typically several hundred dollars.

Besides the companies, the defendants include attorney Randall L. Leshin, Randall L. Leshin, P.A., and Maureen A. Gaviola.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Back to the top |