|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Congress Takes On Data SecurityCritics Say Bills Don't Do Enough to Hold Business & Government Accountable |
|||||||||||||
|
By Martin H. Bosworth January 12, 2007
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) has introduced two bills on data security. One, the "Social Security Number Misuse Prevention Act," would set restrictions on the collection, sale, and display of Social Security numbers by third parties without the accountholder's consent. The bill would set "some limitations" on businesses that request the number, according to Feinstein's office. "If a person's Social Security number is compromised, the path to identity theft is a short one," Feinstein said. "We must ensure that government agencies and businesses take responsibility and protect Americans' Social Security numbers." The Misuse Prevention Act contains exemptions for law enforcement, public health agencies, and businesses to collect and store Social Security numbers for credit and fraud checks, leading critics to say that the bill has too many loopholes to be effective. The Misuse Prevention Act was co-sponsored in part by Sen. John Sununu (R-NH), who recently made waves himself by calling for legislation to prevent the FCC from forcing electronics companies to include "broadcast flags" in their products, designed to stop copying of content. Individuals "Left Defenseless"Feinstein's second bill, the "Notification of Risk to Personal Data Act," sets rules for businesses and agencies that collect personal data to notify individuals of a breach "without unreasonable delay." The bill would require media notification in all circumstances, and Secret Service notification if the breach exceeded 10,000 individual records or one million database entries. "Individuals cannot take the appropriate steps to protect themselves if they are not armed with detailed information about the breach," Feinstein said. "Without that knowledge, individuals are left defenseless to identity thieves." However, the bill contains several significant exemptions. First, law enforcement agencies that are hit with data breaches could delay notification if they deemed it to be a security risk. Businesses can escape the notification law by performing "risk assessments" privately and sharing the results with the Secret Service. And like many previous data security bills that made their way through Congress, Feinstein's bill preempts state laws, including California's, which is much more stringent than Feinstein's measure. Marc Rotenberg, director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), said the bill's current draft "contains too many exceptions and too few rights for Americans whose personal information has been improperly released." Privacy Is Not A PriorityCritics question whether Feinstein's bills will do much to cure cavalier attitude government and business displays towards the security of individuals' data. Every data breach from the Veterans' Administration to Boeing follows a familiar pattern: A massive data breach takes place, the company or agency claims it is an isolated incident, claims to somehow discern that the thieves were after the hardware not the data, offers token credit monitoring services to the victims, and goes back to whatever it was doing. In the case of the VA, The Hill newspaper recently exposed the agency's lack of concern for Congressional mandates to improve its data security and collection procedures. An unidentified whistleblower provided the newspaper with taped meeting conversations, in which VA officials expressed disdain for the demands. "If you want to know what's the real purpose of the data call, read Machiavelli. It's about power, it's about Congress saying, 'VA, you're accountable to us,'" Veterans Affairs official Dr. Joseph Francis is quoted as saying. "We're not asking people to do an A-plus job on this report." So far Congress has largely left it up to government agencies to decide how to safeguard data. A bill was introduced in the previous Congress by Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA) to "institute procedures" for agencies to follow in the event of a data breach -- but that was essentially all it did, without any specific guidance as to what those procedures might be. And the passage of bills criminalizing "pretexting" -- the practice of gaining individuals' records using false pretenses -- in the closing days of the last Congress was soured by the exemptions granted law enforcement, which torpedoed previous attempts to pass anti-pretexting laws. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|