|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
IRS Bans Refund Loans from Free File Program |
|||||||||||||
|
By Martin H. Bosworth December 6, 2006
Third-party tax preparers such as H&R Block have promoted RALs as side offers to customers using the Free File program for the past five years. RALs essentially offer taxpayers an expensive advance loan on their anticipated refund check. Consumer advocates and tax experts have criticized RALs for many reasons. The loans come with excessive interest rates and many hidden fees that are deducted from the final refund before the taxpayer gets it. RALs are heavily targeted towards low-income taxpayers, which made the Free File program especially enticing to tax preparation firms to push the product. The IRS imposed income limits of $50,000 or less to use the Free File program in 2006, but agreed to raise the income limit to $52,000 for the 2007 tax season. The income limits contributed to a 22 percent decrease of participation in the "Free File" program, with 3.8 million taxpayers using it for 2006. Low-income taxpayers coughed up over $900 million in fees and charges just to get the loans for the 2004 tax year, leading Children's Defense Fund president Marian Edelman to call the practice "indefensible." Edelman demanded better assistance for helping children and working families receive their tax benefits without strings attached. H&R Block had the market cornered on the expensive refund loans, leading to a lawsuit filed in California by Attorney General Bill Lockyer. Lockyer charged that the financial services giant not only engaged in deceptive business by charging so many additional fees at exorbitant rates for the loans, but by sharing the taxpayers' personal and financial information with partner companies without their permission. H&R Block faces multiple consumer class action lawsuits over the loans, leading to proposed total settlements of $95 million across multiple states. Lockyer has said that potential damage from the California suit could reach into the "hundreds of millions." Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|