NEWS   RECALLS   COMPLAINT FORM   SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Bookmark and Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive   Education   Employment   Electronics   Family   Finance   Health    Homeowners   Insurance   Pets   Shopping   Travel    Print This     Email This  



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Consumers Sidelined as Broadband Battles Rage





By Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

December 19, 2006

Broadband Access

FCC's Broadband Plan: Who's For It, Who's Not
Feds' Dream of Universal Broadband a Nightmare for Broadcasters
Consumer Watchdogs Challenge Comcast On 'TV Everywhere'
Study Sees Little Hope For Rural Internet Users
New Jersey Settles With Verizon Over Deceptive FiOS Marketing
Consumer Groups Oppose Comcast-NBC Merger
Federal Court Tosses Out FCC Rule On Cable Caps
New Bill Gives FTC Veto Power Over Broadband Caps
Time Warner Cable Changes Contracts To Favor Bandwith Caps
Time Warner Cable Backs Down On Bandwith Caps
Time Warner: Metered Broadband Will Prevent "Internet Brownouts"
FCC Launches National Broadband Internet Plan
Time Warner Doubles Down on Metered Broadband Plans
FCC Pressed To Defend Wireless Open Internet
Time Warner Expands Metered Broadband Billing
New Jersey Sues Verizon Over Deceptive FiOS Marketing
Government Reveals First Steps For Broadband Plans
House Committee Slams FCC Chairman for "Deception and Distrust"
Obama Promises to "Renew Information Superhighway"
Dell Introduces "White Spaces" Capable Laptops
FCC Votes to Open "White Spaces" for Use
Congress Passes Broadband Data Improvement Act
Report: Metered Broadband Bad For Consumers, Businesses
FCC Votes to Punish Comcast for Content Blocking
Comcast Tries to Polish Its Image
Communications Industry Urges Congress to Act on Broadband
Comcast Cuts Deal With Vonage on Internet Traffic
Court Upholds FCC's Video Rules
Report: U.S. Broadband Adoption Slowing
Critics: FCC Inaction Slows Economic Development
Few Are Neutral in Net Neutrality Battles
Google Petitions FCC Over Verizon's Use of Wireless Spectrum
---
More ...

Anyone who's suffered through the high prices, bad customer service, and constant technical problems typical of many local cable company knows that competition is sorely needed in the realm of home entertainment.

Big telecoms like AT&T and Verizon are greedily rushing to the rescue with offers of "triple play" services that combine phone, Internet, and television into one package -- usually at prices lower than rival offerings from cable providers, at least at first.

But the battle over broadband isn't quite as simple as introducing more competition, especially if the only two competitors are the same old local telephone and cable companies.

Indeed, the challenge to deploy new high-speed entertainment packages is bogged down in politics on every level, and while cities, states, Congress, and corporations fight it out, consumers are on the sidelines.

The Franchise

Cable companies have traditionally negotiated franchises with every municipality they want to do business in, and jump through extensive regulatory hurdles to do so.

The payoff for the cable companies has traditionally been unchallenged market dominance in their area, while the cities and counties shake money out of the cable providers to fund pet projects of every description.

The telephone companies want to change all that. They're pushing to pass national video franchising laws, enabling them to bypass existing regulations and roll out new products in a much quicker fashion.

You might call it one-stop lobbying. It was a key component of the massive updates to the Telecommunications Act that the Republican-led 109th Congress was pushing to pass before it adjourned.

But that effort stalled over the issue of "net neutrality," as technology and consumer advocates warned that telecom and cable companies would use the new franchise laws to "cherry-pick" the most affluent neighborhoods for service, leaving poorer communities with second-rate Internet and cable connections on the one hand while, on the other, using their control of the national data circuits to act as highway bandits extorting money from content providers.

At least in theory, the incoming, Democratic-majority Congress looks to have much stronger support for net neutrality as a principle, and any rewrites of telecom law will take that into account.

As a result, telecoms are shifting their negotiations directly to state governments, where they're finding much success.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger recently signed a bill that enabled Verizon to roll out new franchises across the state. The company lobbied very heavily for the bill, and is pushing for similar successes in other states looking for investment.

The telecoms, it should be remembered, have more than a century of experience lobbying state government, since local phone companies were heavily regulated at the state level prior to Congress' giving itself a bigger seat the table with the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

With many of its biggest Congressional supporters now out of power, "it doesn't appear that making another run at federal legislation is the most practical course." Verizon Vice President Tom Tauke said recently.

Commenting on the video franchise issue at the company's "Poliblog," Tauke said that, "Working through these issues in the federal legislative process requires a substantial commitment of resources," which could be better spent at the state and local levels.

Not In My Backyard

Another reason statewide video franchises are being pushed so hard is that local communities are proving troublesome. They're grown accustomed to being courted and paid handsomely by the cable companies, after all.

Beyond that, cities and towns simply want at least some say in how corporations are going to deploy their broadband projects. A chief reason is property values -- in an age where the primary means of building income for most Americans is home equity, having unsightly utility boxes dotting yards is far from popular.

Ars Technica's Nate Anderson documented the struggle between AT&T and many Chicago suburbs over the deployment of AT&T's "U-Verse" franchise.

The town of Geneva wanted to regulate installation of AT&T's boxes and get access to the company's full deployment plans for its service. AT&T promptly sued on grounds that revealing those plans might expose them to competitors.

It's a Catch-22 for companies like Verizon and AT&T. They want to market their high-end Internet TV services and superfast broadband connections to wealthy neighborhoods, but building those services requires lots of construction and redevelopment, which can lead to increasingly ugly neighborhoods and irate homeowners.

Playing Politics

Even without legislation on the national level, the federal government is not letting the battle over video franchises shift to the states without a fight.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, a longtime lapdog of the major telecoms, has derided local franchising agreements as an impediment to consumer choice, ignoring the old GOP dictum that local government is the closest to the people, and has lobbied for national franchise rights throughout most of his tenure.

Now Martin is pushing for the FCC to take action on the franchise question at its next meeting on Dec. 20th, the last one for 2006.

The new measures are being kept quiet by the FCC, and will remain so until after the vote, a development which has alarmed consumer rights groups and cable executives alike.

In an ironic twist, Martin's push for the FCC to act on the video franchise issue comes on the heels of the commission's failure to act on the "megamerger" of AT&T and BellSouth into the world's largest telecommunications company.

The merger, favored by Republican Martin, has been opposed by the FCC's Democratic commissioners and consumer groups that believe the consolidation of the two companies will hurt competition for broadband providers.

The merger is still expected to occur eventually, but any action on the issue will not take place until well into 2007, causing problems for Martin, whose tenure has until now largely been defined by issues of obscenity on broadcast television.

The push for video franchising laws is being viewed by insiders as a way to feather Martin's cap for future political moves.

The Level Playing Field

There's no question that cable companies such as Comcast and Time Warner currently enjoy the fruits of their near-monopoly status, leaving many consumers peeved by what they see as high pricing, bad customer service and lack of options.

But while the idea of luring high-speed competition from the likes of AT&T's U-Verse and Verizon's FiOS to neighborhoods is a good one in principle, it's not as black-and-white as the various sides would make it out to be.

Consumers aren't just served by competition, but also by vigorous enforcement of consumer regulations. Ensuring that local towns and municipalities retain some control over the service provided to their citizens is a key element, most consumer advocates agree.

"Cable competition without consumer and community protections is a license for the Baby Bells to steal," said PIRG's Ed Mierzwinski.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!

Follow us on Twitter.





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• Delivery Services
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2010 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.