|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feds Find Backup Sensors Ineffective |
|||||||||||||
|
By Joe Benton November 14, 2006
As is often the case, the safety regulators are bolstering the auto industry's positions. Automakers have been fighting efforts to make the back-up sensors mandatory, saying the systems would cost hundreds of millions of dollars while saving few, if any, lives. Instead of relying solely on back-up sensors, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) chief Nicole Nason called for "a comprehensive solution to a tragic problem -- children who are backed over by motor vehicles." NHTSA reported camera-based systems may offer the greatest potential to give drivers "reliable assistance in identifying people in the path of the vehicle when backing." Camera systems and back-up sensors are available to consumers as options in an increasing number of new vehicles. NHTSA reported however that sensor-based parking aids used to detect children behind the vehicle are "typically poor, sporadic and limited in range." The NHTSA report was required by the transportation bill approved by Congress last year. "The pain caused by the loss of a child or loved one due to a vehicle back-over is every parent’s worst nightmare," Nason said in a statement. NHTSA told Congress the agency "will continue research to analyze the safety problem more thoroughly and better understand the various scenarios under which such incidents occur. Additional research will be aimed at making technology-based countermeasures more effective." Parents and safety advocates swarmed over Capitol Hill earlier this fall, backing "Kids and Cars bills" that they say could save hundreds of children a year at a minor cost to automakers and consumers. The group puts the death toll from back-over accidents this year alone at 167 -- mostly preschoolers. SUVs and other high-riding vehicles have made the problem worse. The parents won a legislative skirmish at the end of September, when Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, the head of the Senate Commerce Committee, indicated the bill could be considered after Election Day. The Kids and Cars bills address three common ways children get hurt around vehicles -- by shifting them out of park, getting trapped by power windows and being backed over. Back-overs appear to be the most prevalent and the most deadly, but no one knows for sure. That's because NHTSA collects reports on injuries only from vehicles in motion on roads and highways, not driveways or parking lots. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|