|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters Spanish |
|
|
![]() |
Illinois Charges Hospital Job Ads Were Misleading |
|||||
|
November 16, 2006
Attorney General Lisa Madigan's lawsuit names two defendants: Mercury Net Com, Inc., a New York Corporation, and Oliver Oziel, a principal of Mercury Net Com, Inc. According to the allegations in the lawsuit, beginning in at least March 2005, the defendants placed ads in the Chicago Sun-Times and other newspapers that stated:
Madigan claims that the advertisements directed consumers to call a Chicago-area telephone number to obtain more information and led consumers to believe that the information would describe specific jobs. A consumer call to the advertised number resulted in a $15.00 charge to the consumer's local telephone bill. The complaint contends that despite the cost of the call, consumers heard nothing more than a recorded message that provided them with a list of hospitals in the Chicago area at which they could apply for jobs. For each hospital, consumers received only the following information that they could have easily obtained by for free: the hospital address, website address, and the hours of the Human Resources Department. The lawsuit charges the defendants with violating Section 2 of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and with multiple violations of the Illinois Job Referral and Job Listing Services Consumer Protection Act. "Misleading advertisements like this take unfair advantage of people who are searching for better employment options," Madigan said. "Unfortunately, consumers need to be very wary of advertisements services that charge them to obtain information on job listings." Madigan's lawsuit asks the court to prohibit the defendants from advertising, selling, operating or promoting a "job referral service," and from further violating Illinois' consumer protection laws. It seeks a civil penalty of $50,000 and additional penalties of $50,000 for each violation found to have been committed with the intent to defraud. and asks the court to order the defendants to pay restitution to consumers and to pay all costs for the prosecution and investigation of this case. Report Your Experience
|
|||||
Back to the top | |
||||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|