CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Lawsuit Charges Rampant Mutual Fund Timing at Seligman



September 27, 2006

Mutual Fund Timing
Lawsuit Charges Rampant Mutual Fund Timing at Seligman
Federated Settles Mutual Fund Timing Probe
Secret Mutual Fund Timing Alleged at Seligman
PBHG Agrees to Refund $120 Million to Investors
Spitzer Spoils Bank of America's Party
---
Personal Finance News

New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer has filed a complaint against mutual fund manager J. & W. Seligman & Company and its current President, Brian Zino, charging that the firm sanctioned numerous secret timing arrangements that cost small investors $80 million.

The lawsuit refutes a claim by company officials that there was only limited timing activity at Seligman.

The company made that claim last year, saying it had investigated itself thoroughly and found only four cases of timing arrangements that caused $2 million in damage to its investors.

Spitzer's office disagreed and sought a court order requiring Seligman to provide documents and make employees available for testimony. The court granted that request and the Attorney General uncovered 35 previously undisclosed agreements with mutual fund timers.

During the period from 1998 to 2001, Seligman tracked and tolerated the activities of these "special agreements" but did little or nothing to shut them down. For example, one timer was allowed to conduct 400 "round trip" exchanges in six Seligman funds during this period -- a time when regular investors were limited to eight exchanges per fund each year.

"While it is certainly within a company's rights to continue to contest the evidence, the record shows that there was a clear breach of fiduciary duty at Seligman and that the company's damage estimates are inadequate," Spitzer said.

Spitzer said that the company's claim to have investigated itself was disingenuous because it focused on a conveniently limited time frame, from 2001 to 2003. When the Attorney General's office reviewed the "special arrangements" from the earlier time period noted above, investigators found many more timing arrangements that harmed small investors.

The Attorney General's lawsuit, which names the company, its president, its fund distributor and shareholder services agent, seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of fees and profits, and restitution, as well as penalties.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.