|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
TRAVEL
Airlines |
Bus Lines |
Car Rental |
Cruises |
Destinations |
Hotels |
Timeshares |
Travel Agents |
Trains
|
![]() |
States Struggle to Cut Highway Fatality Rate |
||||||||||||||
|
By Dan Schlossberg September 20, 2006
As a result, state transportation agencies are redoubling efforts to make roads safer. But paying for it often poses problems. Budget crunches are forcing states to find low-cost ways to cope with highway safety issues. Such solutions range from repainting roadways to substituting cable for concrete when building barriers. Highway fatalities rose 1.4 per cent last year over the year before and figure to top that percentage when 2006 figures are complete - unless innovative but inexpensive safety solutions work. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, traffic accidents killed 43,443 people last year and 42,836 the year before. States are anxious to lower those numbers. At least four states -- Illinois, New York, Texas, and Virginia -- are experimenting with optical speed bars, short parallel white lines perpendicular to the typical down-the-middle lines. Four other states, including Maryland, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington State, are trying white dots designed to discourage tailgating. Wisconsin officials say cable barriers - designed to prevent head-on collisions caused by motorists who cross lanes into oncoming traffic - work because they absorb impact better than concrete. They also don't cost as much. Removing roadside barriers, from trees to light poles, also helps. Many states have installed breakaway barriers, most notably on supports for overpasses, that "give" when struck by a car. Georgia, reacting to figures that show three of four fatalities occur when cars hit trees, is reacting by removing roadside trees. Speed BarsSeeing optical speed bars painted on the roadway is supposed to give drivers an optical illusion -- that they are going faster than they actually are. But do they work? Virginia's Department of Transportation is completing a three-month test period that started in early summer. Skeptics insist the bars won't work because they are simply another road distraction, along with advertising billboards, highway signs, and painted signs that create turning lanes. Critics also contend that drivers can best monitor speed by checking speedometers frequently. Advocates argue that speed bars have been proven effective in other countries (Virginia is among the states that sends transportation engineers on "scouting missions" outside their normal territory). Such missions don't always work: Washington State junked a $30,000 dot-painting program after three days because it made rush-hour traffic worse. But traffic engineers there and elsewhere are still trying to implement ideas that will improve safety without breaking the bank. Report Your Experience
|
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|