|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
GMC Recall Too Late for California Family |
||||||||||||||
|
By Joe Benton August 10, 2006
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on August 8 ordered a recall that included the 2004 GMC Yukon XL. In announcing the recall, which includes 38,439 vehicles, NHTSA warned that "a fuel rail pulse damper retainer clip that can fracture resulting in a fuel leak which is near an ignition source in the engine compartment." A little less than a month earlier in Newbury Park, California, Veronica woke up to the sound of a horn blaring from inside her garage. "When it would not stop, I started to walk to a window to see what was going on. I realized that the sound was coming from my garage," she told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I opened the door to the garage and saw the interior of my 2004 Yukon XL engulfed in flames and smoke coming out from the gap between the windshield and the hood of the car." Her two sons were sleeping in bedrooms above the garage but Veronica was able to save the children and the family dog. "Help arrived before the fire spread to the rest of the home," she said GMC, on the other hand, has refused any responsibility for the fire despite the NHTSA recall. "We called GMC that same day thinking that they would want to see the car as soon as possible. Instead, they told us they would get back to us in 48 hours," Veronica told us. She described the GMC response to the fire that almost consumed her house as indifference. "We were on the phone with many different departments, at one point speaking to Jackie Vanburg who is an assistant to Rick Wagner," she said. Wagner is the chairman of General Motors. When GM finally contacted Veronica she was told, "If we felt GMC was at fault we could have the car towed at our expense to them and they would take a look at it." The California family hired a fire inspector instead to investigate and the case is still pending. Report Your Experience
|
||||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|