|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Report Blames White House Inaction for High Gas PricesGovernors Fret, Think Tank Advocates More Nuclear Power |
||||||||||||||
|
August 9, 2006
"As gasoline prices and oil industry profits hit record high levels, so too has public frustration and concern," said Ann Wright, Senior Policy Analyst for Consumers Union. "The oil companies continue to be the largest benefactors of our nation's energy policy -- not the American public." A report released by the Consumer Federation of America and Consumers Union claims the following:
"Because the price increases are not driven by costs, oil industry profits have skyrocketed," Mark Cooper, CFA's Director of Research, contends. "Oil companies will make more money this year than they did in 1995 to 1999 combined. Comparing oil industry profits to the Standard and Poors Industrial, the industry will have $120 billion in excess profits in the 2001-2006 period. Cash flow has increased so fast that the industry simply cannot absorb it. Cash flow has exceeded net new investment by $120 billion, yet, Congress continues to lavish favors on the industry." CFA says its membership consists of about 300 nonprofit organizations and claims it speaks "for virtually all consumers." Consumers Union says it is "an independent, nonprofit testing and information organization serving only consumers." In Charleston, S.C., the nation's governors complained that high gas prices and the Alaska oil field shutdown are just the latest results of years of White House neglect. Democratic Gov. Kathleen Blanco of Louisiana, a key state in fuel production and distribution, criticized the federal government's monitoring of critical infrastructure. But Republican Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi said the problem was environmentalists and others who fight increased drilling and pipeline construction. "From our perspective in Louisiana, our wetlands are disappearing and it's exposing our network of pipelines," Blanco said, according to press reports. "That's potentially putting our whole infrastructure at greater risk." She said local development and pollution also spurs erosion, but said more federal involvement is needed. Barbour disagreed. "We need supply to grow. That means more drilling ... more nuclear energy, more coal to liquid," he said. "We see how the shortsightedness of not-in-my-backyard resistance can cause enormous reduction in supply, which is going to result in higher prices." More NukesA report from the National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) suggests combating climate change and ensuring an adequate supply of affordable energy requires creative thinking about the world's energy needs. According to the report, nuclear power holds the most promise as a clean, practical alternative to fossil fuels that could help satisfy the world economy's growing demand for energy. "If we buy the theory that human use of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) is causing global warming, we must reassess how we are going to fuel economic growth in the future," said Pete Geddes, executive vice president of the Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment (FREE) and co-author of the report. "Nuclear power very well could be the best choice to reduce the threat arguably posed by fossil fuels." Sustaining economic growth in developed countries and accelerating growth in the developing world means that energy demand will increase dramatically in the coming century. The International Energy Agency projects world energy demand will grow 65 percent by 2020. According to the report, reducing the amount of CO2 humans put into the atmosphere, while still meeting the energy demands of an expected population of more than 9 billion people by 2050, requires reconsidering nuclear power - a safe, practical alternative. CFA's RetortThe report charges that the recently passed legislation to expand drilling in environmentally sensitive coastal areas will do little to lower prices or free our nation from its addiction to oil.
"The drilling legislation will fatten the oil industry's bottom line, since the oil companies will find "cheap" oil, but charge the world price," Cooper charged. "While the Administration and Congressional leadership continue to push traditional supply-side strategies by promoting drilling, many of the policies we have been advocating for years are garnering bipartisan support. Congress and the Administration should turn their attention to enacting a meaningful energy plan that includes strong efficiency standards and better oversight of the price raising practices of industry," Wright said. The report points out that members from both sides of the aisle have cosponsored proposals to:
"These aggressive efficiency measures will ‘deliver' five to ten times as much capacity to the oil market as the drilling bills recently passed by the House and Senate," Cooper claimed, "and fuel economy-driven oil savings are sustainable for the long term, while the small increase in production that results from expanded drilling is not." The report contends that the results of a recent CFA-sponsored public opinion poll indicate that people are ready for a change in energy policy. According to the results, based on a random national sample:
"Hopefully, if the members of Congress get an earful from their constituents during the summer recess, the Congressional leadership will feel the heat and give these important efficiency measures and consumer protection bills votes when they return in September," Wright concluded. The Nuclear OptionThe NCPA report notes that despite opposition, nuclear power currently produces much of the electric power in developed countries.
Nuclear power has advantages over fossil fuels, the report noted. A single, quarter-ounce pellet of uranium generates as much energy as 3.5 barrels of oil, 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas, or 1,780 pounds of coal, with none of the CO2 emissions. However, conventional reactors only utilize approximately 3 percent of the energy contained in nuclear fuel. If the United States joined France and Japan in recycling used fuel, and recycled the more than 15,000 plutonium pits removed from dismantled U.S. nuclear weapons, existing and recycled supplies would provide an almost unlimited amount of nuclear fuel. Report Your Experience
|
||||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|