CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Lawsuit: Cingular Deceived & Overcharged AT&T Customers



July 7, 2006

Cingular

Billing
Collections
Contracts
Flaming Phones
Reliability
Rebates
Lori's Indictment
Chris' Defense
--
Lawsuit: Cingular Deceived & Overcharged AT&T Customers
Cingular-AT&T Wireless Deal is Done
California Fines Cingular $12 Million
Cingular Buys AT&T Wireless
Consumer Group Sues Nextel, Cingular

Cingular Wireless misled and overcharged millions of AT&T cell phone users when Cingular bought AT&T Wireless, according to a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle.

Cingular bought AT&T's cell phone system in October 2004, after assuring federal regulators that the merger would be "seamless."

But, the lawsuit contends, instead of the new and better services that Cingular promised AT&T customers, Cingular immediately began dismantling and degrading the AT&T network, forcing AT&T customers to move to Cingular's cell network. That meant buying new phone equipment, moving to higher cost plans, and, in some cases, an $18 "transfer" or "upgrade fee."

Some customers who tried to go to another company were hit with "early termination fees" of $175. Others who didn't want to pay or couldn't afford the fees have been stuck with riding out their contract with AT&T Wireless while suffering poor to no reception.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of all AT&T Wireless customers who were deceived or overcharged by Cingular's actions related to the merger by a group of lawyers and law firms, including attorneys for the non-profit Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR), a California-based consumer rights group.

"Cingular promised AT&T customers it would 'raise the bar'; instead, it lowered service quality, forced AT&T customers to move to Cingular, and then raised prices," said Harvey Rosenfield, a lawyer for FTCR.

Pam Pressley, FTCR's Director of Litigation, said, "AT&T customers all over the country have complained about Cingular's conduct. But Cingular gave people no choice: put up with the problems, pay to transfer to Cingular, or pay $175 to get out. Too bad it takes a lawsuit to protect people. Hey, Cingular: 'can you hear us now?'"

Complaints about the deterioration of AT&T service after Cingular bought it are legion.

"Before my contract with up with AT&T, my old phone stopped working. When I went to buy a new one, I was hit with an $18 'upgrade' fee to 'transfer' to Cingular, even though I thought they were now one company," said California resident, Marygrace Coneff, one of the people bringing the suit.

"Talk about a money-making scheme! But I felt I had no other choice if I wanted a functioning phone. If I didn't pay the fee, I would have been hit with an early termination fee. They get you coming and going," she said.

"I was very happy with AT&T until the merger with Cingular in November 2004; that's when all the trouble began," stated Christine Aschero, another plaintiff. "Dropped calls, my phone not ringing, I didn't get voicemails, and my phone would randomly go into 'emergency mode.' I called customer service to complain but their advice never helped. I went to the store to buy another AT&T phone and was told I could only get a Cingular phone and had to sign another two-year contract."

As part of the merger with AT&T, Cingular promised that AT&T's customer base would be allowed use of "the combined network, without roaming charges," and insisted that "customers will continue to enjoy the benefits of their current phones, rate plans and features, without any service interruption."

In fact, AT&T customers were not allowed access to the combined network, and, according to the FCC, Cingular Wireless logged the highest number of consumer complaints in the industry in the first quarter following the merger.

The suit comes one week after the California Court of Appeal upheld a decision by the California Public Utilities Commission imposing a $12.1 million fine against Cingular for promising cell phone service it could not provide and charging customers who tried to cancel early termination fees of up to $500.

FTCR has sued Cingular for that conduct; that case is underway.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

November 21 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

PRINT, MAIL, ETC.


FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!

MOST-VIEWED PAGES

  • Classmates
  • GM-Viagra
  • Sharper Image
  • Sears Auto Centers
  • GE Money Bank
  • Maytag Washers
  • Speed Up Your Metabolism
  • Chinese Formula
  • Aspire
  • Wal-Mart Vision Centers
  • Whirlpool Water Heaters
  • NEW COMPLAINTS

  • Babystyle.com
  • Petro Oil
  • Thane Steamer
  • Thane Vacuum
  • Covergirl
  • Paula Young Wigs
  • Family Dollar
  • Bon Ton Stores
  • Firefly
  • Maidenform.com
  • Hey there! ConsumerAffairs.com is using Twitter.
    Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch throughout the day. Join today to start receiving ConsumerAffairs.com's updates.





    Back to the top |

    Advertisement



    AUTOMOTIVE
    • Dealers
    • Manufacturers
    • Service
    • Extended Warranties
    • Lemon Laws
    • Recalls
    • Tires
    • Transporters

    FAMILY
    • Aging
    • Children, Parenting
    • Recalls
    • Dating
    • Education
    • Entertainment
    • Pets
    • Weddings
    FINANCE
    • Annuities
    • Banks
    • Credit Cards
    • Debt Collection
    • Debt Counseling
    • Insurance
    • Investing
    • Loans
    • Mortgages
    • Payday Loans
    • Student Loans
    • Tax Prep

    HEALTH
    • Drugs, Pharmacies
    • Health Clubs
    • Hearing Care
    • Hospitals
    • Nursing Homes
    • Nutrition, Diets
    • Vision Care
    • Weight Loss
    HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS
    • Appliances
    • Cookware
    • Furniture
    • Home Improvements
    • Lawn & Garden
    • Movers
    • Pools & Spas
    • Realtors, Rental Agents
    • Recalls
    • Utilities

    ELECTRONICS
    • Cable TV/DBS
    • Cameras
    • Cell Phones
    • Computers
    • Home Electronics
    • Internet Access
    • Local Phone Service
    • Long Distance
    • VoIP
    SHOPPING
    • In-Home
    • Online
    • Retail Stores
    • Sporting Goods
    • Supermarkets
    • Telemarketers

    TRAVEL
    • Airlines
    • Bus Lines
    • Car Rental
    • Cruises
    • Hotels
    • Travel Agents
    • Trains

    RESOURCES
    • Class Actions
    • Complaint Form
    • Small Claims Guide
    • Lemon Laws
    CONSUMER NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Automotive
    • Telecom
    • Financial
    • Health
    • Homeowners
    • Scams
    • Seniors
    • Travel
    • More ...

    RECALLS
    • Automotive
    • Children's Products
    • Drugs
    • Food
    • Household Products
    • Sporting Goods

    ABOUT US
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • Newsroom
    • Syndication
    • Terms of Use

    Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

    Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

    Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

    For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

    Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.