|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters Spanish |
|
|
![]() |
Insurance Industry Seeks To Block California Rate Reforms |
|||||
|
July 20, 2006
"The insurance industry wants to stick its heels in the mud and stop reforms that will save good drivers billions of dollars," said Douglas Heller, Executive Director of the nonprofit, nonpartisan Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR). "They want to charge some drivers with perfect records hundreds of dollars more for basic insurance because of the ZIP code in which they live. But the rules no longer allow that and the insurance companies' last-ditch lawsuit will be unsuccessful." The suit was filed in Sacramento Superior Court by three insurance lobbying groups –- American Insurance Association, Association of California Insurance Companies and Personal Insurance Federation of California. An insurance industry lawyer filed a companion suit in Sacramento on behalf of the California Farm Bureau, which FTCR says has longstanding ties to the insurance giant Nationwide Insurance. The suit seeks to restore previous regulations which have allowed insurers to place more emphasis on ZIP code and a motorist's marital status than on driving record. The lawsuit complains the rules would be impossible to implement in a manner fair to all customers. But FTCR says last week Auto Club of Southern California announced that it would follow the Garamendi rules and would lower premiums for 88 percent of its policyholders by an average $134 each. The Garamendi rules require insurers to reform their pricing systems over a two year period to ensure that driving safety records have more of an impact on premiums than ZIP codes or other secondary factors, such as the commonly used marital status factor. The new rules do not bar insurers from considering a customer's address in setting rates; the rules simply bar address from being prioritized over the policyholder's driving record, annual mileage or years licensed. By enacting Prop 103, voters required that those three factors play the biggest role in determining an individual motorist's premium. Report Your Experience
|
|||||
Back to the top | |
||||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|