|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Senate Prepares for Net Neutrality Showdown |
|||||||||||||
|
By Martin H. Bosworth June 20, 2006
In order to effect a compromise on the battles over the right to access Internet content equally, Commerce Committee chair and telecom law author Ted Stevens (R-AK) offered an "Internet Bill of Rights" that would strengthen consumers' ability to file complaints with the FCC if they believed their Internet service was favoring some brands of content over others. Stevens' changes would also mandate the FCC study the issue for five years to determine if net neutrality is genuinely threatened. Those changes were not enough for Commerce co-chair and the law's co-sponsor, Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI). Inouye noted that the bill "utterly [fails] to protect consumers and preserve an open Internet." "Under the current language, network operators will have the ability to dictate what the Internet of the future will look like, what content it will include, and how it will operate," Inouye said. Inouye's objections raised the spectre of the Senate failing to pass new telecom law before the summer recess. The Senate Commerce Committee is scheduled to "mark up" the Stevens Bill on June 22nd, which will determine if it is passed to the full Senate for a vote. The House of Representatives passed its version of telecom law, authored by Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX), that largely favored the interests of telecom companies such as Verizon and AT&T, but the House and Senate bills must be reconciled in joint committee and signed by President Bush before becoming law. With a shortened legislative term due to the November elections, major telecom companies such as Verizon and AT&T are desperate to see new laws on the books that will enable them to compete with cable companies for consumer dollars. One centerpiece of both the House and Senate bills will lift franchising requirements and allow the telecoms to start rolling out cable offerings in markets far more quickly than the existing process allows. But Internet content providers, bloggers, small business owners, and technology experts believe the new laws will enable Internet service providers (ISPs) and network operators to block or discriminate against content they don't favor, and the resulting public outcry has put telecommunications and cable companies alike on the defensive. Supporters of the "Save The Internet" coalition, the primary group supporting net neutrality rights, urged voters to call their Senators and tell them to oppose the Stevens bill unless stronger net neutrality protections are offered. A primary concern of net neutrality supporters is that a "tiered access" Internet, where customers pay more for faster service, will favor wealthier business clients over lower- and middle-income consumers. In a conveniently timed move for the Senate vote, AT&T recently announced a $100 million initiative to provide up to 15,000 families with basic computer equipment, training, and free Internet access. Verizon announced that it would be adding programming offered by the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), including childrens' shows and content aimed at Hispanic viewers, to the rollout of its high-speed FIOS Internet service. Another issue surrounding the telecom legislation is that of competition, and the telecoms were dealt a blow on that front as well. The D.C. Circuit Court ruled on June 18th that telecoms must continue the practice of "unbundling," or allowing business competitors to resell service on their lines for discounted prices. The FCC had partially reversed course on that issue in 2003, stating that telecom network providers didn't have to share their lines with consumer Internet providers. This led to the infamous "FCC vs. Brand X" Supreme Court decision in 2005, which ruled in favor of the FCC. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|