|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Net Neutrality Wins a Small Victory In Congress |
|||||||||||||
|
By Martin H. Bosworth May 26, 2006
The measure now goes to the full House of Representatives for a vote. The "Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act," co-authored by Judiciary Committee chair James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) and Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), was crafted in response to a public outcry in support of Net Neutrality, the principle that all content on the Internet should be accessed equally, and that consumers and content providers should not pay additional fees to network providers in order to access the Web sites they want. The bill would make it "unlawful for any Internet provider to fail to provide its broadband network services on reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms and conditions such that any person can offer or provide content, applications, or services to or over he network in a manner that is at least equal to the manner in which the provider or its affiliates offer content, applications, and services, free of any surcharge on the basis of the content, application, or service." The Sensenbrenner-Conyers bill may be presented as an amendment to the sweeping new telecommunications legislation introduced by House Energy and Commerce Committee chair Joe Barton (R-TX). Barton's bill has no provisions for protecting Net Neutrality, except for granting the Federal Communications Commission the right to enforce the principle in cases of dispute. Sensenbrenner pushed for the Barton bill to be remanded to the Judiciary Committee in order to address the Net Neutrality issue, which he saw as falling under the antitrust umbrella. When that move failed, he and Conyers then introduced their own bill. Fourteen Democrats and six Republicans voted to support the bill. In a statement on his Web site's blog, Rep. Conyers said that an "important victory was won today for the rights of Internet consumers." Conyers credited the "grassroots" efforts of progressive groups such as the MyDD.com blog and MoveOn.org with the victory. "Members of Congress heard from plenty of their constituents about the importance of this bill and not one Democrat voted against it," Conyers said. Both MoveOn.org and MyDD.com are members of the "Save The Internet" coalition, an alliance of organizations dedicated to preserving the principles of equal access to Internet content for all Web users. The coalition boasts a diverse membership, ranging from the Christian Coalition and Gun Owners of America, to rockers Moby and R.E.M and actress Alyssa Milano, as well as hundreds of bloggers, Web writers, and Internet business owners. The "Save The Internet" coalition delivered a petition with over 750,000 signatures to Congress, urging it to support Net Neutrality. The fate of the Net Neutrality push is still unclear. In addition to the Sensenbrenner-Conyers bill, which may be offered as an amendment to the Barton telecom bill, Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) is offering his own "Network Neutrality Act of 2006" for passage in the House. Markey tried unsuccessfully to amend the Barton bill in order to insert provisions preventing the blocking of Internet content. Any bill the House passes must be reconciled with the Senate, where Commerce Committee chairman Ted Stevens (R-AK) is offering his own massive update of telecommunications law. Although Stevens' bill does not directly address Net Neutrality protection, several Senators have offered up separate pieces of legislation that would codify the principles of unfettered Internet access as law. Senators Olympia Snowe (R-MI) and Byron Dorgan (D-ND) authored the "Internet Freedom Preservation Act" in order to prevent, in Snowe's words, "fundamental changes to the Internet that would undo the democratic principles upon which it was founded." Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|